|
Posted by Gilles Vollant on March 6, 2007, 1:23 pm
If you were Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
Hello,
I'll need but a gigabit switch, 8 port.
I found D-Link DGS-1008D or Netgear GS608, by example
I found no test, what is the better gigabit switch for 8 ports, which is
not very expensive?
|
  | |
Posted by Harald Andersen on March 7, 2007, 6:00 am
If you were Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
> Hello,
>
> I'll need but a gigabit switch, 8 port.
> I found D-Link DGS-1008D or Netgear GS608, by example
> I found no test, what is the better gigabit switch for 8 ports, which
> is not very expensive?
I recently bought this one "3CGSU08-ME"
http://www.3com.com/prod/fr_FR_EMEA/detail.jsp?tab=features&sku=3CGSU08
In Norway it costs Kr. 650,- NOK = ? 81,15 EURO
For its price, you get a good name, and a fancy look ;->
I had to put black tape in front of the LED's as I cant stand
that STRONG flashing blue light.
/Hca
|
|
Posted by phn on March 7, 2007, 1:24 pm
If you were Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
> Hello,
>
> I'll need but a gigabit switch, 8 port.
>
> I found D-Link DGS-1008D or Netgear GS608, by example
>
> I found no test, what is the better gigabit switch for 8 ports, which is
> not very expensive?
You usually get what you pay for. Cheap one are - cheap. You really
must ask
yourself "how much performance do i need" "and how do i figure out
where my
bottleneck is". A cisco 4948 would give you top performance, but can
you
fill it ?
Said that, get a cheap one, chances are that the bridge is not your
bottleneck.
|
|
Posted by glen herrmannsfeldt on March 7, 2007, 1:41 pm
If you were Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
phn wrote:
(snip)
> You usually get what you pay for. Cheap one are - cheap.
> You really must ask yourself "how much performance do i need"
> "and how do i figure out where my bottleneck is".
> A cisco 4948 would give you top performance, but can you
> fill it ?
I believe that there are chip sets, or maybe a single chip
for the smaller switches, so all one has to do is build a
box and power supply around one.
> Said that, get a cheap one, chances are that the bridge is
> not your bottleneck.
For home use, I would agree. It might be that more expensive
ones have a better power supply, for example, and would be
better in some environments.
-- glen
|
|
Posted by Rick Jones on March 7, 2007, 2:47 pm
If you were Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
Not sure if it is in the desired price range, but HP ProCurve has an 8
port Gigabit Ethernet switch out there now:
http://www.hp.com/rnd/products/switches/ProCurve_Switch_1800_Series/overview.htm
are managed versions, and then there are:
http://www.hp.com/rnd/products/switches/switch2708-2724/overview.htm
which are unmanaged. I've had occasion to use the 2724 myself and was
happy with it. I've not had occasion yet to try the 1800's - while
I'm not in the ProCurve part of the HP house, the old saying about the
cobblers children still applies :)
rick jones
--
portable adj, code that compiles under more than one compiler
these opinions are mine, all mine; HP might not want them anyway... :)
feel free to post, OR email to rick.jones2 in hp.com but NOT BOTH...
|
| Similar Threads | Posted | | Cisco vs. Netgear: 24 port gigabit managed switch | February 10, 2006, 4:44 pm |
| difference b/w inter-switch link port and trunk port | July 6, 2008, 12:06 pm |
| Port on switch going crazy........ | October 2, 2006, 11:48 am |
| 16 port unmanaged switch | April 15, 2007, 4:22 pm |
| Sharing a switch port | August 30, 2008, 3:17 pm |
| Switch Killed Computer's LAN port | April 2, 2005, 11:04 pm |
| Switch performance with many-to-one port traffic | October 1, 2006, 10:21 pm |
| Assign static IPs to port of a managed switch | June 24, 2005, 10:42 am |
| Media converter vs Switch with Fiber port | January 12, 2006, 1:04 am |
| obtaining port bits per second data from switch | August 29, 2006, 12:20 pm |
|
|