|
Posted by on July 13, 2008, 11:18 am
If you were Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
Hello,
Will need to deploy 10 or 20 (possibly a lot more later) 2960's for
IP phones and Pcs not quite sure which kit should be upstream. Would
there be a obvious best choice for copper uplink and an obvious best
choice for fiber?
TIA
Martin
|

| |
Posted by Lars Christensen on July 13, 2008, 2:05 pm
If you were Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
martin_ian_lewis@yahoo.com wrote in news:9dccf5f4-50bf-4dd7-bbe7-
23929d1bf811@b1g2000hsg.googlegroups.com:
> Hello,
>
> Will need to deploy 10 or 20 (possibly a lot more later) 2960's for
> IP phones and Pcs not quite sure which kit should be upstream. Would
> there be a obvious best choice for copper uplink and an obvious best
> choice for fiber?
>
Hi Martin,
The answer is... It depends...
Usually you use he 2960's for access switches which uplinks to some
aggregation switches, usually more centralized installed. Whether you use
fiber or copper for the uplink depends on the cablerun.
If the cablerun from access switch to aggregation switch is more than 300
feet, you need fiber.
Most switch platforms used for aggregation may have a large number of
fiber interfaces or a large number of copper interfaces. Therefore it
depends on the aggregation switch.
In most scenarios the choise would be fiber for uplink ports.
Regards,
Lars Christensen
CCIE #20292
|
|
Posted by Doug McIntyre on July 14, 2008, 12:11 am
If you were Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options martin_ian_lewis@yahoo.com writes:
>Will need to deploy 10 or 20 (possibly a lot more later) 2960's for
>IP phones and Pcs not quite sure which kit should be upstream. Would
>there be a obvious best choice for copper uplink and an obvious best
>choice for fiber?
Depends on the distances involved, and what you are hooking into.
Otherwise, there's no difference between copper or fiber for how well
it works, the main use for fiber now-a-days is distance considerations.
|
|
Posted by Barry OGrady on July 15, 2008, 7:21 am
If you were Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options On Sun, 13 Jul 2008 08:18:11 -0700 (PDT), martin_ian_lewis@yahoo.com wrote:
>Hello,
>
>Will need to deploy 10 or 20 (possibly a lot more later) 2960's for
>IP phones and Pcs not quite sure which kit should be upstream. Would
>there be a obvious best choice for copper uplink and an obvious best
>choice for fiber?
Depends on the distance.
>TIA
>
>Martin
Barry
=====
Home page
http://members.iinet.net.au/~barry.og
|
| Similar Threads | Posted | | Cisco 10/100 switch with 2 GB fiber and 2 GB copper | February 1, 2006, 5:48 am |
| Using a Gigabit copper to Gigabit fiber media converter for an IDF | May 3, 2006, 7:56 pm |
| T1 line bandwidth qustion Upstream downstream | April 6, 2006, 7:48 pm |
| Problem Daisy-Chaining 2950 Using Copper Giga | September 22, 2005, 11:10 am |
| CSS 11503 Gig over Copper Ports - Talk to Fast Ethernet? | August 15, 2006, 12:23 pm |
| G.655 fiber and GLC-LH-SM GLC-ZX-SM | December 4, 2005, 7:55 am |
| ios for 2960 | May 11, 2006, 6:14 pm |
| VTP Issue with 2960 | February 19, 2007, 11:53 am |
| How do you test 1000Base-SX over MM Fiber?? | April 25, 2006, 11:14 am |
| Link aggregation over fiber -- possible? | May 25, 2006, 5:15 pm |
|
|