|
Posted by PL on December 5, 2006, 7:45 pm
If you were Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options What model router would I need between the inside interface of the PIX
and the rest of the network to do netflow? I have a 1720 and 2524
that I'm not using but those are WAN routers and I need a LAN router.
What's the least expensive LAN router that would work here?
Thanks,
Peter
On Wed, 29 Nov 2006 22:16:42 GMT, "stephen"
>> How are people monitoring traffic on their PIX? I sometimes find that
>> certain users take up all of our available T1 bandwidth and it's a
>> pain trying to figure out who's doing it, especially in real time. Is
>> this possible somehow, I don't mind third party utilities if
>> necessary. How about limiting the amount of bandwidth that each node
>> can use?
>>
>> The PDM can display a little graph showing the utilization of the
>> outside interface, but it doesn't allow to drill down to see which
>> internal node is generating the traffic and that's what I'm interested
>> in. I'd like to see which internal IP is communicating with which
>> external IP and how much bandwidth they're taking up.
>
>maybe you should try to monitor elsewhere?
>
>if you have a router between the "inside" interface and the rest of the
>network, then i suggest you look at using accounting or netflow / IPFIX on
>that.
>
>this should give you info to the flow level - ie monitor individual TCP
>connections
>
>the command line on the router will give you enough for a quick and dirty
>"look" when there are problems.
>
>If you want long term tracking and so on you will need a server to capture
>the netflow info, handle the data manipulation and do all the "top 10" style
>presentation and drill down.
>
>this kind of setup can do everything you are talking about and a fair bit
>more - as long as the traffic goes thru the boxes where you set up
>netflow......
>
>www.cisco.com/go/netflow
>>
>> This PIX is doing NAT for the network.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Peter.
|