|
Posted by Robert Bonomi on January 30, 2008, 6:54 pm
If you were Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options >Was the "Z" that appears on old dials ever used as a _dialable_
>letter?
>
>I know certainly special numbers had Zs in them since they had to be
>placed via the operator.
>
>But I'm asking if there were exchanges like an AZtec 3 (203)? I think
>the use of Z on dials was discontinued before the NPA was drawn up, so
>that wouldn't have conflicted.
The operator answered all calls placed to ZAnzibar, ZUlu, and ZYmurgy exchanges,
as well as the better known ZEnith numbers. <grin>
This leads into potentially dangerous territory -- see the Robert Silverberg
story "MUgwump Four" about strange prefixes.
>Also, did the Bell System issue phones that had numbers only in places
>where there were no lettered exchanges, such as small towns that had
>only 5 or less digits to begin with. There were many places like
>that. I think the Independent companies issued such phones, but I've
>never seen a WE phone like that. Maybe they simply standardized on
>the letter-number layout for all phones.
Right. why make two models of phone, that differed only in the paint scheme.
more parts to manufacture, more parts to stock, more overhead all the way
around. Standardize on a single variant wherever possible. it's -cheaper-.
>I've heard that dials in other countries had different lettering than
>US dials. Has dial lettering been standardized for world wide
>uniformity, meaning foreign dials converted to the US standard?
Nope.
|