[telecom] Manual and Magneto Phone Systems [Telecom]

[telecom] Manual and Magneto Phone Systems [Telecom]

NewsGroups | Search | Tools
 comp.dcom.telecom  Post an article  get this group's latest topics as an RSS feed add this group's latest topics to your My MSN content add this group's latest topics to your My Yahoo content  add this group's latest topics to your Google content  YahooMyWeb Yahoo!  Google Google  Windows Live Favorites Windows Live  del.icio.us del.icio.us  digg digg  Add to Netscape Netscape
Subject Author Date
[telecom] Manual and Magneto Phone Systems [Telecom] Wes Leatherock 08-16-2008
Posted by Wes Leatherock on August 16, 2008, 9:05 pm
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options



On Friday, August 15, 2008 8:40 AM "Anthony Bellanga"

> Regarding Lisa Hancock's inquiry about manual and magneto systems:
>
> Just because a system used *MAGNETO RINGING* does NOT necessarily
> mean that all phones had *LOCAL BATTERY* for *TALKING*.
>
> And just because a system had *COMMON BATTERY* for powering *TALKING*
> does NOT necessarily mean that all phones had centralized ringing
> machines!
>
> Power for ringing is (usually) Alternating Current;
> power for the talk circuit is Direct current.

The classifications of central offices in those days were
"magneto," which was understood to mean magneto signalling, local talk
battery, and "common battery," which was understood to mean common
talk and supervisory battery and machine ringing. This was the usual
teleco usage as applied to central offices.

The central office had machine ringing whether it was magneto or
common battery*.

A very significant part of common battery operation is the
supevision that was inherent. Local batteries would have been
incompatible with the supervisory functions. The same battery was
used for both talk and supervision.

But there indeed might be some magneto lines in a common battery
exchange. That was particularly true in earlier days when rural
magneto lines (usually one conductor and ground) were served from a
common battery office. And, yes, there might be 20 or 30 or more
parties. They were in variably very noisy and also other subscribers
might listen in, creating an additional source of leakage.

Customers on these lines had code ringing and magnetos to signal
the operator or other subscribers on the line. These terminated on a
different section of the switchboard, where either typical megneto
drops signaled the operator or adapters brought in a lamp signal.
Either way, while customers were supposed to "ring off," when they
finished their conversation, many of them failed to do so and the
operator had to challenge from time to time.

These were usually owned by the subscribers and also maintained,
or not maintained, by the subscribers.

Common battery operation required pretty clean loops. Magneto
lines could operator in very marginal conditions.

Very long loops could not supervise in a common battery
environment, so there might be some exceptionally arranged for magneto
(ringdown) signalling and which required local battery at the distabnt
location.

Different, and not exacly comparable to central offices, were toll
stations and private line circuits used by "right-of-way" companies,
such as railroads, pipeline companies and others. In the days when
Bell companies and most independents would not connect with non-telco
opeerations, "right-of-way" companies were an exception and telcos
would interconnect with them freely.

* - There were reportedly some very small magneto exchanges where the
operator had a magento crank she turned manually. I never was in such
an office.



Wes Leatherock
wleathus@yahoo.com
wesrock@aol.com






Pure Networks
Posted by on August 18, 2008, 11:18 am
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options


> But there indeed might be some magneto lines in a common battery
> exchange. . . .

That was fairly commoh in the past, perhaps nearby lines in the
village would be common battery, but the rural farmers would have
magneto. Pictures of small town switchboards often had a combination
of drops and lamps.

> Different, and not exacly comparable to central offices, were toll
> stations and private line circuits used by "right-of-way" companies,
> such as railroads, pipeline companies and others.  In the days when
> Bell companies and most independents would not connect with non-telco
> opeerations, "right-of-way" companies were an exception and telcos
> would interconnect with them freely.

Many magneto private lines were in use through the 1970s on railroads.
Some telephone sets appeared relatively modern, like a 500 set except
a handle where the dial should be for the magneto and a push to talk
button (to preserve battery life). They used two Everready No. 6
"intermitent service" dry cells wired in series. Apparently the
chemistry of such cells was such that in telephone service the cells
would recover after a little use. (When I was a kid I used a No. 6
cell for experiments and they had a long life span. I wonder if they
still make them.)

I believe the Bell System allowed interconnection with railroads
because of the hazards and difficulties involved in maintaining lines
on an active railroad right-of-way.

The Pennsylvania Railroad had a massive telephone network, including
its own toll testboards. In some towns the railroad PBX was dial
while the host town was still manual. In contrast, the neighboring
Reading Company used magneto phones. Amtrak and Conrail replaced the
networks. (In more recent years track ways were used to bury fiber).

The Bell System offered a special PBX desk console intended for
dispatchers, such as in railroads and oil pipelines. The console had
numerous switches, dials, and a few cords and jacks. I don't think
they were so much to switch calls from point to point but rather for
the dispatcher(s) to receive and make calls. If anyone can add
details about these consoles, please do so.

> * - There were reportedly some very small magneto exchanges where the
> operator had a magento crank she turned manually.  I never was in such
> an office.

Many switchboards had a magneto crank to be used if there was a power
failure and there was no machine ringing current. It would've been
quite tiring for operators to turn cranks all day long. The few
cranks I've turned had resistance.

***** Moderator's Note *****

I once saw a temporary telephone office set up in the basement of a
telephone CO, for use by government employees during a high-level
visit to Boston. It was composed of two 555 cord boards, with magneto
hand cranks on each. I asked the obvious question, and the answer was
"These never break".

The operators, btw, bet us they could outcrank any _TWO_ guys in the
office. It was a sucker bet, and it cost me ten bucks: after pocketing
my money, they confided that they were really military men, and that
cranking magnetos was part of their daily physical training. The held
the crank with their fingers curled around it, as if gripping a
hammer, instead of by "pinching" it the way most of us do.

It was my own fault: they had plastic belts on, and the only place you
buy those is at the PX: having been in the Army, I should have known.
The boards were, of course, connected to the office ringing machine,
but it was clear that the operators were ready to do without at any
time.

Bill Horne
Temporary Moderator

Please put [Telecom] at the end of your subject line, or I may never
see your post! Thanks!

We have a new address for email submissions: telecomdigestmoderator
atsign telecom-digest.org. This is only for those who submit posts via
email: if you use a newsreader or a web interface to contribute to the
digest, you don't need to change anything.


Posted by Steven Lichter on August 18, 2008, 7:45 pm
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options


hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com wrote:
>> But there indeed might be some magneto lines in a common battery
>> exchange. . . .
>
> That was fairly commoh in the past, perhaps nearby lines in the
> village would be common battery, but the rural farmers would have
> magneto. Pictures of small town switchboards often had a combination
> of drops and lamps.
>
>> Different, and not exacly comparable to central offices, were toll
>> stations and private line circuits used by "right-of-way" companies,
>> such as railroads, pipeline companies and others. In the days when
>> Bell companies and most independents would not connect with non-telco
>> opeerations, "right-of-way" companies were an exception and telcos
>> would interconnect with them freely.
>
> Many magneto private lines were in use through the 1970s on railroads.
> Some telephone sets appeared relatively modern, like a 500 set except
> a handle where the dial should be for the magneto and a push to talk
> button (to preserve battery life). They used two Everready No. 6
> "intermitent service" dry cells wired in series. Apparently the
> chemistry of such cells was such that in telephone service the cells
> would recover after a little use. (When I was a kid I used a No. 6
> cell for experiments and they had a long life span. I wonder if they
> still make them.)
>
> I believe the Bell System allowed interconnection with railroads
> because of the hazards and difficulties involved in maintaining lines
> on an active railroad right-of-way.
>
> The Pennsylvania Railroad had a massive telephone network, including
> its own toll testboards. In some towns the railroad PBX was dial
> while the host town was still manual. In contrast, the neighboring
> Reading Company used magneto phones. Amtrak and Conrail replaced the
> networks. (In more recent years track ways were used to bury fiber).
>
> The Bell System offered a special PBX desk console intended for
> dispatchers, such as in railroads and oil pipelines. The console had
> numerous switches, dials, and a few cords and jacks. I don't think
> they were so much to switch calls from point to point but rather for
> the dispatcher(s) to receive and make calls. If anyone can add
> details about these consoles, please do so.
>
>> * - There were reportedly some very small magneto exchanges where the
>> operator had a magento crank she turned manually. I never was in such
>> an office.
>
> Many switchboards had a magneto crank to be used if there was a power
> failure and there was no machine ringing current. It would've been
> quite tiring for operators to turn cranks all day long. The few
> cranks I've turned had resistance.
>
> ***** Moderator's Note *****
>
> I once saw a temporary telephone office set up in the basement of a
> telephone CO, for use by government employees during a high-level
> visit to Boston. It was composed of two 555 cord boards, with magneto
> hand cranks on each. I asked the obvious question, and the answer was
> "These never break".
>
> The operators, btw, bet us they could outcrank any _TWO_ guys in the
> office. It was a sucker bet, and it cost me ten bucks: after pocketing
> my money, they confided that they were really military men, and that
> cranking magnetos was part of their daily physical training. The held
> the crank with their fingers curled around it, as if gripping a
> hammer, instead of by "pinching" it the way most of us do.
>
> It was my own fault: they had plastic belts on, and the only place you
> buy those is at the PX: having been in the Army, I should have known.
> The boards were, of course, connected to the office ringing machine,
> but it was clear that the operators were ready to do without at any
> time.
>
> Bill Horne
> Temporary Moderator
>
> Please put [Telecom] at the end of your subject line, or I may never
> see your post! Thanks!
>
> We have a new address for email submissions: telecomdigestmoderator
> atsign telecom-digest.org. This is only for those who submit posts via
> email: if you use a newsreader or a web interface to contribute to the
> digest, you don't need to change anything.
>
My grand parents farm in Minnesota was on a magneto system, they went
from that to a full digital system, the local company had to send out
people to do training. Some did not want their system to change. I got
the phone and have it in my collection along with a few others that i
got from others in the area; back then no one thought about collecting
them. I remember a barn in Wisconsin years ago that had all kinds of
telephones and parts, they were selling for pennies.

I have the phone hooked to my line with a switch, some years ago when my
daughter was about 18 months she came into the den and pulled the crank,
I was at work and my wife said a short time later Pacific Telephone
repair people showed up, they said it took out the protector in the CO
and one ones on my box. I was told to remove the phone, what I did was
put a switch on the magneto.

--
The Only Good Spammer is a Dead one!! Have you hunted one down today?
(c) 2008 I Kill Spammers, Inc. A Rot In Hell Co.


Posted by Scott Dorsey on August 18, 2008, 10:04 pm
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options


>My grand parents farm in Minnesota was on a magneto system, they went
>from that to a full digital system, the local company had to send out
>people to do training. Some did not want their system to change. I got
>the phone and have it in my collection along with a few others that i
>got from others in the area; back then no one thought about collecting
>them. I remember a barn in Wisconsin years ago that had all kinds of
>telephones and parts, they were selling for pennies.

That would be Phoneco in Janesville, WI. They are still around, though
the original owner has since died. They still have all kinds of
telephones and parts, but they aren't selling them for pennies any longer.
--scott

--
"C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."


Similar ThreadsPosted
Manual and Magneto Phone Systems [Telecom] August 15, 2008, 10:50 am
Modern magneto phone [Telecom] October 8, 2008, 2:49 pm
RE: Modern magneto phone [Telecom] October 9, 2008, 12:05 pm
manual for PTT 5101 Telephone Network Simulator [Telecom] April 16, 2008, 3:06 pm
History -- last Bell System crank (magneto local battery) phones? [telecom] August 14, 2008, 2:57 pm
Re: History -- last Bell System crank (magneto local battery) phones? [telecom] August 16, 2008, 1:56 am
[telecom] History--special Panel dialing for manual and party lines? February 6, 2008, 2:36 pm
[Telecom] RE: History--special Panel dialing for manual and party lines. February 7, 2008, 11:29 am
Multiline expandable cordless systems [Telecom] September 5, 2008, 10:40 am
Product Reviews of Online Voicemail Systems [Telecom] June 29, 2008, 7:48 am

other useful resources:
The Federal Communications Commission (FCC)
Telecommunications Industry Association
Electronic and Software Security Products and Services
International Telecommunication Union

Custom CGI Perl and PHP programming by 1-Script.com

Contact Us | Privacy Policy
The site map in XML format XML site map