|
Posted by Barry Margolin on August 13, 2005, 4:52 pm
If you were Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
> Hi All,
>
> I have a setup like this:
>
> 192.168.100.0/24 is a VLAN with internet connection via ISP1.
> 172.16.100.0/24 is a VLAN with internet connection via ISP2.
>
> Right now, I have these VLANs on separate (Catalyst 4506) switches. I
> am trying to combine them onto a single switch, with route-maps. Here
> is my configuration:
>
> access-list 160 permit ip 172.16.100.0 0.0.0.255 any
> route-map ISP2 permit 20
> match ip address 160
> set ip next-hop 172.16.100.254
> int vlan 50
> desc ISP2
> ip address 172.16.100.1 255.255.255.0
> ip policy route-map ISP2
> int vlan 25
> desc ISP1
> ip address 192.168.100.1 255.255.255.0
>
> This works fine. Now, I'd like to have IP connectivity between the two
> VLANs. How should I modify my ACL for that? I tried:
Change "set ip next-hop" to "set ip default next-hop". Then the policy
route will only override the default route. Connected routes, static
routes, and routes learned via a routing protocol will still be used
between the VLANs.
--
Barry Margolin, barmar@alum.mit.edu
Arlington, MA
*** PLEASE post questions in newsgroups, not directly to me ***
| 
Yahoo! 
Google 
Windows Live 
del.icio.us 
digg 
Netscape 
XML site map