route field

route field

NewsGroups | Search | Tools
 comp.dcom.lans.ethernet  Post an article  get this group's latest topics as an RSS feed add this group's latest topics to your My MSN content add this group's latest topics to your My Yahoo content  add this group's latest topics to your Google content  YahooMyWeb Yahoo!  Google Google  Windows Live Favorites Windows Live  del.icio.us del.icio.us  digg digg  Add to Netscape Netscape
Subject Author Date
route field vicky 06-29-2008
---> Re: route field Walter Roberson06-29-2008
---> Re: route field Albert Manfredi06-29-2008
Posted by vicky on June 30, 2008, 5:22 am
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
> Albert Manfredi wrote:
> >> hi,
> >> =A0 =A0 is there is a necessity of route field in layer 2 switch ...
>
> > Can you be more specific in describing what you are asking?
>
> Maybe he is asking about CFI + E-RIF support which is not necessary
> to support. If I remember correctly the standard suggests that packets
> with CFI should not be supported in modern equipment.
>
> --Kim

--------------------------------------------------------

what is the replacement of CFI to new one
can u tell me....

one more thing
is the SVL concept is relied as a logical one or it depends on switch
controller
if it given that one ATU table is supported then is it means that of
SVL or what.....

Network Magic Graduation 20% off animated banner
Posted by vicky on June 30, 2008, 8:41 am
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
> Albert Manfredi wrote:
> >> hi,
> >> =A0 =A0 is there is a necessity of route field in layer 2 switch ...
>
> > Can you be more specific in describing what you are asking?
>
> Maybe he is asking about CFI + E-RIF support which is not necessary
> to support. If I remember correctly the standard suggests that packets
> with CFI should not be supported in modern equipment.
>
> --Kim

------------------------------

Hello

can u plz clear the meaning of the statemnent of CFI in fddi snap

In a SNAP-encoded tag header transmitted using FDDI MAC methods, CFI
has the following meanings:
1) When the frame takes the source-routed form (i.e., the RII bit is
set in the frame=92s source MAC
Address field and a RIF follows the source MAC Address), the
interpretation of the CFI bit is
as defined in a) for SNAP-encoded tag headers transmitted using 8802-5
MAC methods. The ERIF
field is not present in this form;
2) When the frame takes the transparent form (i.e., the RII bit is
reset in the frame=92s source MAC
Address field and there is no RIF following the source MAC Address),
the interpretation of the
CFI bit and the presence or absence of the E-RIF is as defined in b)
for Ethernet-encoded tag
headers transmitted using 802.3/Ethernet MAC methods.


it is defined in ieee standerd 1q


Posted by vicky on June 30, 2008, 8:01 am
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
>
> > hi,
> > =A0 =A0 is there is a necessity of route field in layer 2 switch ...
>
> Can you be more specific in describing what you are asking?
>
> For example, to me it souds like you are asking whether layer 2
> connectivity MUST be provided within a mesh of layer 2 switches
> (bridges).
>
> If that's what you're asking, then it all depends what you want to do.
> For example, you can simply not connect these switches together at
> all. Just use them as the hub of a star-topology network, for multiple
> independent star networks. If you want to allow connectivity among the
> many star topologies, you simply install layer 3 routers between them,
> as necessary.
>
> VLANs are supposed to emulate physcially separate LANs, or physically
> separate catenets (to be more precise). If you build a network of
> layer 2 switches in which each Ethernet segment belongs to a different
> VLAN, you are emulating a case of multiple independent, physically
> disconnected LANs. Your previous example did not permit any
> communications between the Ethernet LANs at all, at layer 2.
>
> Bert

----------------------------------------

what is the mac_service_data_unit
what part of frame is it contain

as in IEEE standard of stp and 1q here mentioned this term

The
frame_type,
mac_action,
destination_address,
source_address,
mac_service_data_unit,
user_ priority,
and frame_check_sequence

please also tell me

is the sequence of a mac frame is seems to be changed
as normally tell the frame as
DA, SA, Type, Data, FCS

but here in IEEE stp and 1q the sequence seems from frame type ...
-------------------------
plz tell me the description of the

frame_type,
mac_action,
destination_address,
source_address,
mac_service_data_unit,
user_ priority,
and frame_check_sequence


and also tell how a end station make user priority
or a host is not vlan aware then also is it able to send priority
tagged frames (null VLAN ID).

Thanks

Vikrant

Posted by Albert Manfredi on June 30, 2008, 11:16 am
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options

> what is the mac_service_data_unit
> what part of frame is it contain

It's the "data content" part of a MAC frame that is used for the
special service frames of the Internal Sublayer Service. So it's not
the same frame as used in the normal peer-to-peer MAC service. Clause
6.4 of 802.1Q covers this. For example, this service frame can be used
to set the VLAN IDs in a switch, or to check parameters such as
MAC_operational or other status parameters of a switch.

Bert

Posted by Albert Manfredi on June 30, 2008, 11:30 am
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
> For example, this service frame can be used
> to set the VLAN IDs in a switch, or to check parameters such as
> MAC_operational or other status parameters of a switch.

Scratch that first example. I'm not sure the ISS can do that.

Bert

Similar ThreadsPosted
Static route or NAT January 9, 2008, 2:42 am
Backup-Route + Traffic June 11, 2007, 6:09 am
VLANs: do all switches in a route have to support it? March 10, 2005, 10:25 pm
802.11 Fixed Field Elements September 8, 2006, 4:07 pm
Multicast MAC in Source MAC Address Field August 30, 2005, 5:13 pm
Length field in 802.3 for tagged frames November 24, 2006, 4:02 am

other useful resources:
The Federal Communications Commission (FCC)
Telecommunications Industry Association
Electronic and Software Security Products and Services
International Telecommunication Union

Custom CGI Perl and PHP programming by 1-Script.com

Contact Us | Privacy Policy
The site map in XML format XML site map