catalyst 6500 power

catalyst 6500 power

NewsGroups | Search | Tools
 comp.dcom.sys.cisco  Post an article  get this group's latest topics as an RSS feed add this group's latest topics to your My MSN content add this group's latest topics to your My Yahoo content  add this group's latest topics to your Google content  YahooMyWeb Yahoo!  Google Google  Windows Live Favorites Windows Live  del.icio.us del.icio.us  digg digg  Add to Netscape Netscape
Subject Author Date
catalyst 6500 power simon.marsden 02-20-2006
---> Re: catalyst 6500 power CiscoHeadsetAda ..02-20-2006
|--> Re: catalyst 6500 power Roman Nakhmanso ..02-20-2006
Posted by on February 20, 2006, 5:23 am
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
we are having 2 new 6513's and 2 new 6509's, with 2 4000watt and 2
3000watt PSU's respectively.

Cisco state this:

All AC power supply inputs are fully isolated.
-Source AC can be out of phase between multiple power supplies in the
same chassis, which means that PS1 can be operating from phase A and
PS2 can be operating from phase B.
-Source AC can be out of phase between AC inputs on power supplies
that are equipped with multiple AC inputs, which means that power cord
1 can be plugged into phase A and power cord 2 can be plugged into
phase B.

http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/switches/ps708/products_installation_guide_chapter09186a008020e0d3.html#wp1026596

But our installer (a major UK provider) recommend the following.

"Both power supplies in the same chassis need to be on the same phase,
they can be fed from different PDUs and this is probably more
resilient. But must be on the same phase otherwise strange things
happen to the catalyst because of the harmonics."

Who's advice should we listen to?

Rgds, Big Si.


Posted by Merv on February 20, 2006, 5:49 am
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
You are talking about some fairly expensive gear.

I would suggest that you get Cisco and your installation project
manager in the same room to review this issue.


Posted by CiscoHeadsetAdapter.com on February 20, 2006, 9:20 am
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
> we are having 2 new 6513's and 2 new 6509's, with 2 4000watt and 2
> 3000watt PSU's respectively.
>
> Cisco state this:
>
> All AC power supply inputs are fully isolated.
> -Source AC can be out of phase between multiple power supplies in the
> same chassis, which means that PS1 can be operating from phase A and
> PS2 can be operating from phase B.
> -Source AC can be out of phase between AC inputs on power supplies
> that are equipped with multiple AC inputs, which means that power cord
> 1 can be plugged into phase A and power cord 2 can be plugged into
> phase B.
>
>
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/switches/ps708/products_installation_guide_chapter09186a008020e0d3.html#wp1026596
>
> But our installer (a major UK provider) recommend the following.
>
> "Both power supplies in the same chassis need to be on the same phase,
> they can be fed from different PDUs and this is probably more
> resilient. But must be on the same phase otherwise strange things
> happen to the catalyst because of the harmonics."
>
> Who's advice should we listen to?
>
> Rgds, Big Si.
>

Hi Simon,

Probably you should change your "a major UK provider". :-)))

Cisco clearly states in their specification, that PSs are FULLI INSULATED.
Plus, even looking logically, Power Supplies provide DC power to the switch.
Switch has no synchronization from the AC power. And even if "strange things
happen to the catalyst", it's Cisco's problem and this should be resolved by
the Cisco. I would trust more to the Cisco's words, than to an installer,
unless they can provide proven track of a Catalyst failure "because of the
harmonics".

Good luck,

Mike
CCNP, CCDP, CCSP, Cisco Voice, MCSE W2K, etc...
-------
www.ciscoheadsetadapter.com



Posted by thrill5 on February 20, 2006, 11:30 pm
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
Your "Major UK Provider" might know networking, but they sure as hell don't
know anything about electricity. The power supplies in the 6000 chassis are
industrial strength (which is why you pay an arm and a leg for them!) and
are full isolated. What this means is that power supply A is completely
isolated from power supply B. Imagine you have two toasters, each plugged
into two different receptacles on different phases. Will toasting bread at
the same time cause "strange toasting behavior" to occur because of
"harmonics" of the different phases? That sounds wacky because it is! This
is also true for your power supplies because even though they are in the
same chassis, they are completely independent of each other. On the bigger
power supplies that have two AC inputs you in fact have two power supplies
in one "box" and each is isolated from the other.. If you had two of these
in one chassis, you would have 4 power supplies, each completely distinct
from the other.

The power supplies take AC in and convert it to DC power that is then
supplied to the chassis backplane, which is then used to power the blades
in the chassis. The power supplies do not provide any AC power to the
backplane. Since we are running on DC power there is no chance of
"harmonics" affecting any component in the system (harmonics only affect AC
systems, not DC systems) Since the power supplies are isolated, one power
supply can't affect the other. If the power supplies were not isolated, a
problem on one power supply could affect the other, and the power supplies
would no longer be redundant, which is why they are isolated in the first
place.

This whole idea about using the same AC phase is crazy. Many of the power
supplies can use two phase AC input. (three wire, one neutral and two "hot")
Each of the "hot" wires are on a separate phase (This is how 208v is
supplied in the US). For full redundancy, you should have power supplied
from two different PDU's, and power supplied from each of the PDU on
different phases. This way, if you loose a PDU, you still have power, if
you loose a phase A, and power is supplied from phase A on both PDU's you
loose power to both. If you get power from phase A, on PDU 1, and phase B
from PDU 2, the only way you are down is if you loose power on both phases.

Scott

>> we are having 2 new 6513's and 2 new 6509's, with 2 4000watt and 2
>> 3000watt PSU's respectively.
>>
>> Cisco state this:
>>
>> All AC power supply inputs are fully isolated.
>> -Source AC can be out of phase between multiple power supplies in the
>> same chassis, which means that PS1 can be operating from phase A and
>> PS2 can be operating from phase B.
>> -Source AC can be out of phase between AC inputs on power supplies
>> that are equipped with multiple AC inputs, which means that power cord
>> 1 can be plugged into phase A and power cord 2 can be plugged into
>> phase B.
>>
>>
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/switches/ps708/products_installation_guide_chapter09186a008020e0d3.html#wp1026596
>>
>> But our installer (a major UK provider) recommend the following.
>>
>> "Both power supplies in the same chassis need to be on the same phase,
>> they can be fed from different PDUs and this is probably more
>> resilient. But must be on the same phase otherwise strange things
>> happen to the catalyst because of the harmonics."
>>
>> Who's advice should we listen to?
>>
>> Rgds, Big Si.
>>
>
> Hi Simon,
>
> Probably you should change your "a major UK provider". :-)))
>
> Cisco clearly states in their specification, that PSs are FULLI INSULATED.
> Plus, even looking logically, Power Supplies provide DC power to the
> switch. Switch has no synchronization from the AC power. And even if
> "strange things happen to the catalyst", it's Cisco's problem and this
> should be resolved by the Cisco. I would trust more to the Cisco's words,
> than to an installer, unless they can provide proven track of a Catalyst
> failure "because of the harmonics".
>
> Good luck,
>
> Mike
> CCNP, CCDP, CCSP, Cisco Voice, MCSE W2K, etc...
> -------
> www.ciscoheadsetadapter.com
>
>



Posted by Roman Nakhmanson on February 20, 2006, 12:06 pm
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
Hi
well "more resilient" big time 8-), imagine one phase will overload
then what? right, BOTH power supplies are down.

Use different phases - if one is overloaded, you still have power from
the second one.
just make sure everything is REALLY grounded.

Roman Nakhmanson
PS. please change your "major UK provider" to less major (more minor),
they usually make more sense ;-)


Similar ThreadsPosted
Do anyone have Catalyst 2901 power supply October 6, 2007, 8:59 am
Catalyst 2901 Modular and Power Supply October 26, 2007, 11:21 am
Internal Power Supply for Catalyst 2960 December 17, 2007, 4:08 pm
Catalyst 6500 help October 9, 2007, 2:42 pm
Catalyst 6500 [FWSM] [CSM] May 4, 2006, 3:51 am
Help with NAT configuration on a Catalyst 6500 with no FWSM December 6, 2006, 5:49 pm
Problems with radius on Catalyst 6500 (CatOS) January 23, 2007, 4:24 am
instructions on how to perform an IOS upgrade on a Catalyst 6500 switch (IOS to IOS) May 30, 2007, 12:31 pm
Problem with Catalyst 6500 and HP Auto Port Agregation protocol July 7, 2005, 9:36 pm
No link between fiber converter and Catalyst 6500, works with Router 7301 January 12, 2007, 2:27 am

other useful resources:
The Federal Communications Commission (FCC)
Telecommunications Industry Association
Electronic and Software Security Products and Services
International Telecommunication Union

Custom CGI Perl and PHP programming by 1-Script.com

Contact Us | Privacy Policy
The site map in XML format XML site map