|
Posted by Rich Greenberg on January 20, 2008, 12:19 pm
If you were Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
Suppose I (with call waiting) am on the phone speaking to person A.
Person B calls me. Person B gets ringback and I get CW beeps.
If I ignore the CW beeps, person B gets RNA (Ring No Answer) until they
give up.
Is this the proper result or should Person B's ringback change to busy
after some interval? Or does this depend on the switch type?
Telcodata shows the switch as CLLI: NFMYFLXBRS0 but does not show the
type of switch. The LEC is Embarq.
--
Rich Greenberg N Ft Myers, FL, USA richgr atsign panix.com + 1 239 543 1353
Eastern time. N6LRT I speak for myself & my dogs only. VM'er since CP-67
Canines:Val, Red, Shasta & Casey (RIP), Red & Zero, Siberians Owner:Chinook-L
Retired at the beach Asst Owner:Sibernet-L
|
 
| |
Posted by danny burstein on January 20, 2008, 12:31 pm
If you were Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
>Suppose I (with call waiting) am on the phone speaking to person A.
>Person B calls me. Person B gets ringback and I get CW beeps.
>If I ignore the CW beeps, person B gets RNA (Ring No Answer) until they
>give up.
>Is this the proper result or should Person B's ringback change to busy
>after some interval? Or does this depend on the switch type?
Everytime I've made such a call I get RNA. In the old days
that went on just this side of forever; nowadays I bump into
a general timeout after a couple of minutes.
>Telcodata shows the switch as CLLI: NFMYFLXBRS0 but does not show the
>type of switch. The LEC is Embarq.
--
_____________________________________________________
Knowledge may be power, but communications is the key
dannyb@panix.com
[to foil spammers, my address has been double rot-13 encoded]
|
|
Posted by Robert Bonomi on January 28, 2008, 11:50 pm
If you were Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options >Suppose I (with call waiting) am on the phone speaking to person A.
>
>Person B calls me. Person B gets ringback and I get CW beeps.
>
>If I ignore the CW beeps, person B gets RNA (Ring No Answer) until they
>give up.
>
>Is this the proper result or should Person B's ringback change to busy
>after some interval? Or does this depend on the switch type?
>
If person B calls you, and you are _not_ on the phone, Person B gets
ringback, and your phone rings.
If you ignore the ringing, person B continues to get ring until they give
up.
Is _this_ the proper result,or should Person B's ringback change to busy
after some interval? Or does this depend on the switch type?
Answer my questions, and you'll have the answers to yours. <grin>
Note: AFAIK, the -called- switch never 'arbitrarily' changes the call status.
The *originating* switch _may_ decide an unanswered all is 'unproductive'
and 'forcibly terminate' the call. I suspect it's a simple matter of
feature programming.
|
|
Posted by John L on January 29, 2008, 12:11 am
If you were Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options >Note: AFAIK, the -called- switch never 'arbitrarily' changes the call status.
The switch that handles my AT&T mobile phone does. I don't have voice mail
so it rings for a while and eventually goes to an AT&T recording saying
that the customer isn't there.
|
|
Posted by Robert Bonomi on January 29, 2008, 3:43 pm
If you were Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options >>Note: AFAIK, the -called- switch never 'arbitrarily' changes the call status.
>
>The switch that handles my AT&T mobile phone does. I don't have voice mail
>so it rings for a while and eventually goes to an AT&T recording saying
>that the customer isn't there.
Which is not changing the call status, but just re-directing the call -- to
wit, "Call Forward No Answer" -- to a generic intercept (without SIT tones).
so that the caller doesn't get billed.
|
| Similar Threads | Posted | | How do you clear the message waiting light on PanasonicKX-T7453? | September 16, 2005, 7:32 pm |
| Interactive Voice Response - IVR Info | May 4, 2006, 6:33 pm |
| Interactive Voice Response - IVR Info | August 1, 2006, 3:19 pm |
| Interactive Voice Response Systems | November 22, 2006, 10:51 am |
| CSTA Rejected-Transient Response on Hipath 3500 | July 19, 2006, 5:43 am |
| Speech-Enabled Interactive Voice Response Systems | November 11, 2006, 1:01 pm |
| call in one line out another | June 12, 2007, 9:38 am |
| Call does not show up as ever having occurred | February 14, 2005, 8:06 pm |
| Nortel Call Pilot 100 | March 11, 2005, 12:34 am |
| Need name for 3-party call bridging | April 5, 2005, 3:13 pm |
|
|
Yahoo! 
Google 
Windows Live 
del.icio.us 
digg 
Netscape 
XML site map