|
Posted by Rich Piehl on April 18, 2007, 7:27 pm
If you were Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com wrote:
> Would anyone have any opinions regarding service quality of Verizon
> vs. Cingular basic cellphone services?
>
> Also, in comparing basic "free" handsets from each provider (per their
> web page), it seems(?) that Cingular gives more features or better
> phones than Verizon. Of course, that could be just hype.
>
> Cingular offers the LG CU400, which has "Video3G". The store said
> they had a free headset with it as well.
>
>
> The CU400 battery is stated to last talk-5 hour and standby-288
> hours. Verizon's free phones' batteries last roughly talk-3 hours and
> standby-162 hours. I don't understand why Verizon batteries don't
> last as long, unless it is hype.
>
> Any comments would be appreciated. Thanks!
>
Hi, there...strayed over from MTR didja'?
Is Cingular still Cingular? I thought they were converting all their
operations over to AT&T.
As far as signal my experience has been that any company can give good
or bad quality signal at any given location or city. In my house for
example: I haven't tested it recently but it used to be that a Sprint
phone could only get a signal towards the back of the house while an
AT&T (the original version) cell could only get a signal at the front of
the house.
Take care,
Rich
God bless the USA
--
Et in terra pax
| 
Yahoo! 
Google 
Windows Live 
del.icio.us 
digg 
Netscape 
XML site map