|
Posted by Marc on May 26, 2005, 4:23 am
If you were Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
Is there anyway to make a wireless PCI network card stop hogging the CPU?
|

| |
Posted by $Bill on May 26, 2005, 1:05 am
If you were Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
Marc wrote:
> Is there anyway to make a wireless PCI network card stop hogging the CPU?
How does a card hog CPU ?
My task manager only shows processes using CPU. If there is a process
talking to the card and it's using a lot of CPU, you could lower its
priority if you think it won't have adverse affect.
|
|
Posted by Basic Bob on May 29, 2005, 12:38 am
If you were Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
>
> Is there anyway to make a wireless PCI network card stop hogging the CPU?
>
>
>
Sure, if you are the designer, there are three things: chipset, firmware,
and driver.
For the rest of us, the best you can do is pick a card which does not hog
the CPU. Generally, the fastest cards do more work right on the NIC so there
is less for the CPU to do.
Which card/OS/system are you having trouble with?
--
Basic Bob
gbasigcbobg@gatt.gnet
the g's are silent
|
|
Posted by Marc on June 1, 2005, 10:47 pm
If you were Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
>> Is there anyway to make a wireless PCI network card stop hogging the CPU?
> Sure, if you are the designer, there are three things: chipset, firmware, and
driver.
> For the rest of us, the best you can do is pick a card which does not hog the
CPU.
And which card is that?
Generally, the fastest cards do more work right on the NIC so there
> is less for the CPU to do.
Same question.
|
|
Posted by $Bill on June 1, 2005, 5:54 pm
If you were Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
Marc wrote:
>
>>
>>>Is there anyway to make a wireless PCI network card stop hogging the CPU?
>>
>>Sure, if you are the designer, there are three things: chipset, firmware, and
driver.
>>For the rest of us, the best you can do is pick a card which does not hog the
CPU.
>
> And which card is that?
Don't know, but you should check the docs for each card and see what the
description says. We had cards years ago that were called smart cards
that did much of the TCP/IP work on the card (which had its own CPU and
was downloaded with firmware on system startup).
Today's CPUs are so fast that I wouldn't even bother paying the extra bucks
for a smart card (we were running like 286's back in those days and it made
sense at the time). I would think 3Com would have smart cards and you probably
pay at least quadruple for them since a reg card is like $10-20. They'll offer
remote management, processing offload features and the like.
The NIC shouldn't be hogging the CPU unless you either have negligible CPU
or extremely high network traffic. I would check both first. See what the
CPU is like with the network disabled and see how much traffic you have
with the net enabled and a monitoring tool checking the traffic load. You
can get a little info from the Task Manager Networking tab (on XP and the
like for example). I seldom go over 1% network utilization unless downloading
which still stays under 10% since it's WB (not local LAN).
|
| Similar Threads | Posted | | Re: Wireless network card hogs cpu | May 26, 2005, 3:12 am |
| modem and ethernet card not talking | April 16, 2005, 7:39 am |
| GigE card from Cuda 12000 | May 12, 2008, 8:59 am |
| Erratic Ethernet Card - Problems connecting to internet. Please HELP. | March 4, 2005, 3:02 am |
| Problem with Linksys Wireless-B 2.4GHz wireless router (BEFW1154) | April 8, 2006, 8:48 pm |
| Problem with Linksys Wireless-B 2.4GHz wireless router (BEFW1154) | April 8, 2006, 8:48 pm |
| Need help with network setup | June 2, 2005, 1:13 pm |
| network path not accesible | June 20, 2005, 8:05 am |
| network path not accesible | July 2, 2005, 7:04 am |
| how to connect to PC on comcast network | December 9, 2005, 5:24 pm |
|
|