What is the default precedence: local-route, static-route, OSPF-route?

What is the default precedence: local-route, static-route, OSPF-route?
NewsGroups | Search | Tools
User Password
Register Now! Lost Password?
 comp.dcom.sys.cisco  Post an article  get this group's latest topics as an RSS feed add this group's latest topics to your My MSN content add this group's latest topics to your My Yahoo content  add this group's latest topics to your Google content  YahooMyWeb Yahoo!  Google Google  Windows Live Favorites Windows Live  del.icio.us del.icio.us  digg digg  Add to Netscape Netscape
Subject Author Date
What is the default precedence: local-route, static-route, OSPF-route? ilan.berco 08-04-2008
Posted by on August 4, 2008, 3:00 am
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
Hi

What is the default precedence: local-route, static-route, OSPF-route?
Based on ipForwardProto (2/1/13)
Need a reference (RFC?)

Thanks in advance
Ilan

Pure Networks
Posted by Uli Link on August 4, 2008, 3:24 am
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
ilan.berco@gmail.com schrieb:
> Hi
>
> What is the default precedence: local-route, static-route, OSPF-route?
> Based on ipForwardProto (2/1/13)
> Need a reference (RFC?)

The metric of the route

--
Uli

Posted by on August 4, 2008, 4:32 am
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
On 4 =D7=90=D7=95=D7=92=D7=95=D7=A1=D7=98, 10:24, Uli Link <VonRechts.NachL=
i...@usenet.arcornews.de>
wrote:
> ilan.be...@gmail.com schrieb:
>
> > Hi
>
> > What is the default precedence: local-route, static-route, OSPF-route?
> > Based on ipForwardProto (2/1/13)
> > Need a reference (RFC?)
>
> The metric of the route
>
> --
> Uli

Thanks.
In that case, the direct-route will allways have priority (since it's
cost is 0).
Any reference please?
Ilan

Posted by Merv on August 4, 2008, 8:56 am
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options


administrative distance of the routes in question

0 connected routes

1 static routes

110 OSPF routes


Thus connected preferred over static preferred over OSPF


Posted by on August 4, 2008, 9:36 am
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
On 4 =D7=90=D7=95=D7=92=D7=95=D7=A1=D7=98, 15:56, Merv <merv.hr...@rogers.c=
om> wrote:
> administrative distance of the routes in question
>
> =C2=A0 =C2=A00 =C2=A0 connected routes
>
> =C2=A0 =C2=A01 =C2=A0 static routes
>
> 110 OSPF routes
>
> Thus connected preferred over static preferred over OSPF

Thanks. So "administrative distance" is prior to metric?
Does the command: "Precedence =3D ospf rip static" overrides the default
"administrative distance"?

Similar ThreadsPosted
Citrix IP Precedence November 1, 2006, 9:24 am
Re: route-map precedence ? May 28, 2005, 7:30 am
QoS config IP Precedence Value Question November 20, 2006, 4:36 pm
Does the Cisco VPN client map the IP Precedence from the IP headers? July 19, 2005, 11:52 am
traffic-limit problem and ip precedence June 7, 2006, 9:08 am
Cisco Security Manager, how does the policy manager handle precedence? September 18, 2007, 12:34 pm
Traffic-shaping traffic with precedence 2 June 12, 2008, 5:05 am
Traffic-shaping traffic with precedence 2 June 12, 2008, 11:14 am
Default GW June 13, 2007, 4:01 am
dmz and default gateway March 13, 2005, 3:44 pm

other useful resources:
The Federal Communications Commission (FCC)
Telecommunications Industry Association
Electronic and Software Security Products and Services
International Telecommunication Union

Custom CGI Perl and PHP programming by 1-Script.com

Contact Us | Privacy Policy
The site map in XML format XML site map