VRF's & GRE

VRF's & GRE

NewsGroups | Search | Tools
 comp.dcom.sys.cisco  Post an article  get this group's latest topics as an RSS feed add this group's latest topics to your My MSN content add this group's latest topics to your My Yahoo content  add this group's latest topics to your Google content  YahooMyWeb Yahoo!  Google Google  Windows Live Favorites Windows Live  del.icio.us del.icio.us  digg digg  Add to Netscape Netscape
Subject Author Date
VRF's & GRE Darren Green 07-09-2008
Posted by Darren Green on July 9, 2008, 4:41 pm
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
I have done a little work using VRF's recently and understand to a
limited extent their purpose.

I now have a situation where I have to use a GRE tunnel across a carrier
MPLS cloud to solve a particular problem.

My questions:

When a VRF is configured, is the VRF / RD value physically 'tagged' to a
route when the route is advertised out to a neighbor using a dynamic
routing protocol?

When I configured a VRF previously I assigned my VRF value to both
routing information as well as a physical interface on my router. If a
VRF is a routing instance why was it needed on the interface?

Most importantly, if I use GRE, does the GRE header hide the route
tagging so that it is invisible as it flows over the carrier network ?
NB My tunnel interface will be assigned with the VRF value.

Regards

Darren


other useful resources:
The Federal Communications Commission (FCC)
Telecommunications Industry Association
Electronic and Software Security Products and Services
International Telecommunication Union

Custom CGI Perl and PHP programming by 1-Script.com

Contact Us | Privacy Policy
The site map in XML format XML site map