VLAN woes...

VLAN woes...

NewsGroups | Search | Tools
 comp.dcom.lans.ethernet  Post an article  get this group's latest topics as an RSS feed add this group's latest topics to your My MSN content add this group's latest topics to your My Yahoo content  add this group's latest topics to your Google content  YahooMyWeb Yahoo!  Google Google  Windows Live Favorites Windows Live  del.icio.us del.icio.us  digg digg  Add to Netscape Netscape
Subject Author Date
VLAN woes... Geir Holmavatn 01-06-2008
Posted by Geir Holmavatn on January 6, 2008, 5:21 pm
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
Hi,

If I have a router with a gigabit port assigned both 192.168.10.1 VLAN
ID 10 and 192.168.20.1 with VLAN ID 20. I connect a cable from this
router port to port 1 on a D-Link DGS-1216T managed switch.

I create two VLANs in this switch, VLAN ID 10 where ports
1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8 and 9 are members and VLAN ID 20 where ports
1,10,11,12,13,14,15 and 16 are members. Note that port 1 is a member in
both VLANs.

Can I now connect computers which don't know anything about VLANs to
these switch two port ranges and automatically be connected to the
appropriate router subnet according to the switch port, or isn't this
possible? If not I assume that I also need to tag the workstations'
nics with the correct VLAN ID, but I hope this is not necessary.

Thanks a lot of someone can enlighten me on VLAN principles..

/geir

Network Magic Graduation 20% off animated banner
Posted by jpd on January 6, 2008, 6:04 pm
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
> If I have a router with a gigabit port assigned [... to two vlans ...]
> I create two VLANs in this switch, [... port assignments ...]
> Note that port 1 is a member in both VLANs.
>
> Can I now connect computers which don't know anything about VLANs to
> these switch two port ranges and automatically be connected to the
> appropriate router subnet according to the switch port, or isn't this
> possible? If not I assume that I also need to tag the workstations'
> nics with the correct VLAN ID, but I hope this is not necessary.

Your clients probably expect frames without a vlan tag, so no; you should
configure those ports to merely be a switchport in a vlan and the NICs
should receive untagged frames.

The one port that has two vlans, though, should be configured for
sending and receiving frames with vlan tags in them. That way, the
switch can use the tags in the frames to sort out what vlan the frames
belong to. It does mean the switch gets to add or remove the tags as
needed, depending on what port the frame passes through.

Note that one vlan on such a port can be implicit, or ``native'',
meaning that frames without a tag are assumed to belong to that vlan.
You would have to configure that on both the switch and the router.


--
j p d (at) d s b (dot) t u d e l f t (dot) n l .
This message was originally posted on Usenet in plain text.
Any other representation, additions, or changes do not have my
consent and may be a violation of international copyright law.

Similar ThreadsPosted
Superstack woes November 8, 2006, 12:45 pm
VLAN Help (for a Vlan newbie) November 6, 2006, 12:09 pm
port-based vlan and tag-based vlan October 21, 2008, 2:03 pm
port-based vlan and tag-based vlan October 21, 2008, 2:03 pm
VLAN December 13, 2005, 10:23 am
VLAN and VPN January 17, 2007, 1:05 pm
VPN Vs VLAN December 21, 2007, 3:54 pm
VLAN May 24, 2008, 2:08 am
mac vlan September 29, 2008, 10:14 am
VLAN and Subnet March 27, 2005, 1:31 pm

other useful resources:
The Federal Communications Commission (FCC)
Telecommunications Industry Association
Electronic and Software Security Products and Services
International Telecommunication Union

Custom CGI Perl and PHP programming by 1-Script.com

Contact Us | Privacy Policy
The site map in XML format XML site map