|
Posted by vicky on July 5, 2008, 2:10 am
>
> > Hello
>
> > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 I 've a query related on the topic =A0VLAN Aggregation =
=A0is in my
> > shared web file folder
>
> > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 named as =A0: =A0 VLAN Aggregator.txt
>
> > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 I m giving u my web shared file link
>
> > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0http://vikrantpandey.diinoweb.com/fi=
les/
>
> > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 please give some of your time for watching =
my query =A0and
> > plz reply .
>
> In RFC 3069, Table 2, followed by Section 6, are what really matters.
>
> It's obvious that you can aggregate IP addressed among LANs. You do
> this anytime you connect two Ethernet hosts to an Ethernet layer 2
> switch (i.e. bridge), and assign those two to the same IP subnet. So
> it should be clear that the same can be done between VLANs.
>
> RFC 3069 says that implementation details are not considered in the
> RFC. Seems to me, you can create a single spanning tree, then use IP
> addresses to determine who the various members are in each VLAN. This
> is a valid way to create VLANs.
>
> Also, pay attention to this text in Section 6:
>
> "That is, when an address or range of addresses is allocated to a
> given sub-VLAN, reception of IP or ARP packets on a sub-VLAN with a
> source IP address that isn't allocated to the sub-VLAN should be
> discarded, ..."
>
> So, the way I'd set this up, a single broadcast domain, and only IP
> addresses used to differentiate between VLANs.
>
> Bert
---------------------------------------------------------------------------=
------------------
Hello Sir
as u write
Seems to me, you can create a single spanning tree,
then use IP
addresses to determine who the various members are in
each VLAN. This
is a valid way to create VLANs.
can u plz define how by creating a single spanning tree , and using IP
address to determine who the various members are in each vlan.
Vikrant
| 
Yahoo! 
Google 
Windows Live 
del.icio.us 
digg 
Netscape 
XML site map