Switch vs. Router

Switch vs. Router

NewsGroups | Search | Tools
 alt.certification.cisco  Post an article  get this group's latest topics as an RSS feed add this group's latest topics to your My MSN content add this group's latest topics to your My Yahoo content  add this group's latest topics to your Google content  YahooMyWeb Yahoo!  Google Google  Windows Live Favorites Windows Live  del.icio.us del.icio.us  digg digg  Add to Netscape Netscape
Subject Author Date
Switch vs. Router nich326 04-12-2005
Posted by on April 12, 2005, 1:36 pm
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options


To all the Cisco Experts.

What is the difference between a router and a layer 3 switch?


Posted by Bob by the Bay on April 12, 2005, 12:41 pm
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options


Essentially, in a multi-layer switch, the layer 3 functionality (and other
the upper layer capabilities) are deployed in ASICs to attain wire speed at
those layers. There are some other minor differences in capabilities, but
generally a layer 3 capable switch is configured very similarly to a router
to take advantage of the layer 3 functionality.

FWIW,
Robert


> To all the Cisco Experts.
>
> What is the difference between a router and a layer 3 switch?




Posted by Herb Martin on April 12, 2005, 11:29 pm
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options


> To all the Cisco Experts.
>
> What is the difference between a router and a layer 3 switch?

Let's try the simple answer and see if you need more:

A (plain) router doesn't have the ability to make the
rapid and temporary physical/electrical connections
that (any of) the switches make.

A layer three switch, commonly called a switch-router,
is a switch which uses routing protocols and methods
to decide which connections to actually make.

(As opposed to a layer-2 or bridge type router which
typically uses MAC addresses to make such decisions.)

A router (switch or not) is always (network) protocol
specific and uses the logical address and the specific
routing protocols of that network protocol to make
decisions.

If someone points at a device and says, "This router
is NOT protocol specific since it routers some/all of
IP, IPX, AppleTalk etc..." then notice that for EACH
of these network protocols the routing is done separately,
using the logical (e.g., IP) address of that protocol and
the routing protocols and methods specific to that network
protocol.





Similar ThreadsPosted
HELP --> 2501 and Catalyst 1900 switch problem. Cannot get e0 on router to come up when connected to any ports on switch @@@@ June 1, 2006, 9:29 pm
IP Router/Switch SpreadSheet April 24, 2005, 12:03 pm
IOS upgradation of switch, router and pix January 11, 2006, 4:58 am
Connecting a Switch to a Router April 1, 2006, 3:39 pm
route from router to layer3 switch October 2, 2007, 5:42 am
Connecting a Switch 1900 to a Router 2503 June 17, 2005, 12:24 pm
Router and Switch models of CCNA study November 9, 2008, 8:54 pm
1900 switch & 2500 router connection problem March 12, 2006, 2:23 pm
How do you connect a 1900 series switch to a 2501 series Router April 1, 2006, 3:42 pm
2900 Series switch V 2950 switch September 7, 2006, 1:05 pm

other useful resources:
The Federal Communications Commission (FCC)
Telecommunications Industry Association
Electronic and Software Security Products and Services
International Telecommunication Union

Custom CGI Perl and PHP programming by 1-Script.com

Contact Us | Privacy Policy
The site map in XML format XML site map