Subnetting question?

Subnetting question?

NewsGroups | Search | Tools
 alt.certification.cisco  Post an article  get this group's latest topics as an RSS feed add this group's latest topics to your My MSN content add this group's latest topics to your My Yahoo content  add this group's latest topics to your Google content  YahooMyWeb Yahoo!  Google Google  Windows Live Favorites Windows Live  del.icio.us del.icio.us  digg digg  Add to Netscape Netscape
Subject Author Date
Subnetting question? daytime 04-28-2007
Posted by daytime on April 28, 2007, 2:26 am
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options


Hi all -I saw this question and cant figure out how to work it out-all
help gratefully appreciated-
The mask used is 255.255.254.0
It asks which of the following 3 addresses can be used-
113.10.4.0
186.54.3.0
175.33.3.255
26.35.2.255
152.135.7.0
17.35.36.0

Am I right in thinking the mask allows 510 usable hosts per subnet in
a class C and only 1 host in a Class B?
Thanks alot-I know the answers but dont understand why.


Posted by Brian V on April 28, 2007, 7:12 am
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options



> Hi all -I saw this question and cant figure out how to work it out-all
> help gratefully appreciated-
> The mask used is 255.255.254.0
> It asks which of the following 3 addresses can be used-
> 113.10.4.0
> 186.54.3.0
> 175.33.3.255
> 26.35.2.255
> 152.135.7.0
> 17.35.36.0
>
> Am I right in thinking the mask allows 510 usable hosts per subnet in
> a class C and only 1 host in a Class B?
> Thanks alot-I know the answers but dont understand why.
>

Yes there are 510 usable hosts in a /23. Classes are really meaningless once
you break the /8, /16 or /24 boundry. Example 10.0.0.0/23 is technically a
class "A" address, it still contains 510 hosts. 172.16.0.0/23 is technically
a class "B" address, it still contains 510 hosts. 192.168.0.0/23 is
technically a class "C" address, it still contains 510 hosts.

When using a /23 mask there is a very quick shortcut you can use. If the 3rd
octet is an even number it immeadiately tells you it contains the network
address and the rest are valid hosts. If the 3rd octet is an odd number it
immeadiately tells you it contains all hosts and the broadcast address.
113.10.4.0 is a network address
186.54.3.0 is a valid host, it belongs to the 186.54.2.0/23 network.
175.33.3.255 is the broadcast address for the 175.33.2.0/23 network
26.35.2.255 is a valid host on the 26.35.2.0/23 network
152.135.7.0 is a network address
17.35.36.0 is a valid host on the 17.35.35.0/23 network



Posted by daytime on April 28, 2007, 11:13 am
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options


>
>
> > Hi all -I saw this question and cant figure out how to work it out-all
> > help gratefully appreciated-
> > The mask used is 255.255.254.0
> > It asks which of the following 3 addresses can be used-
> > 113.10.4.0
> > 186.54.3.0
> > 175.33.3.255
> > 26.35.2.255
> > 152.135.7.0
> > 17.35.36.0
>
> > Am I right in thinking the mask allows 510 usable hosts per subnet in
> > a class C and only 1 host in a Class B?
> > Thanks alot-I know the answers but dont understand why.
>
> Yes there are 510 usable hosts in a /23. Classes are really meaningless once
> you break the /8, /16 or /24 boundry. Example 10.0.0.0/23 is technically a
> class "A" address, it still contains 510 hosts. 172.16.0.0/23 is technically
> a class "B" address, it still contains 510 hosts. 192.168.0.0/23 is
> technically a class "C" address, it still contains 510 hosts.
>
> When using a /23 mask there is a very quick shortcut you can use. If the 3rd
> octet is an even number it immeadiately tells you it contains the network
> address and the rest are valid hosts. If the 3rd octet is an odd number it
> immeadiately tells you it contains all hosts and the broadcast address.
> 113.10.4.0 is a network address
> 186.54.3.0 is a valid host, it belongs to the 186.54.2.0/23 network.
> 175.33.3.255 is the broadcast address for the 175.33.2.0/23 network
> 26.35.2.255 is a valid host on the 26.35.2.0/23 network
> 152.135.7.0 is a network address
> 17.35.36.0 is a valid host on the 17.35.35.0/23 network

Thanks alot for the explanation-will definitely remember the /23
shortcut you explained-I think what threw me was looking at the
26.35.2.255 I thought it was a b/c because of the .255 -however I am
assuming the b/c would be 26.35.255.255 ?


Posted by John Petersen on April 28, 2007, 11:49 am
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options


On Sat, 28 Apr 2007 07:12:06 -0400

>
> > Hi all -I saw this question and cant figure out how to work it out-all
> > help gratefully appreciated-
> > The mask used is 255.255.254.0
> > It asks which of the following 3 addresses can be used-
> > 113.10.4.0
> > 186.54.3.0
> > 175.33.3.255
> > 26.35.2.255
> > 152.135.7.0
> > 17.35.36.0
> >
> > Am I right in thinking the mask allows 510 usable hosts per subnet in
> > a class C and only 1 host in a Class B?
> > Thanks alot-I know the answers but dont understand why.
> >
>
> Yes there are 510 usable hosts in a /23. Classes are really meaningless once
> you break the /8, /16 or /24 boundry. Example 10.0.0.0/23 is technically a
> class "A" address, it still contains 510 hosts. 172.16.0.0/23 is technically
> a class "B" address, it still contains 510 hosts. 192.168.0.0/23 is
> technically a class "C" address, it still contains 510 hosts.
>
> When using a /23 mask there is a very quick shortcut you can use. If the 3rd
> octet is an even number it immeadiately tells you it contains the network
> address and the rest are valid hosts. If the 3rd octet is an odd number it
> immeadiately tells you it contains all hosts and the broadcast address.
> 113.10.4.0 is a network address
> 186.54.3.0 is a valid host, it belongs to the 186.54.2.0/23 network.
> 175.33.3.255 is the broadcast address for the 175.33.2.0/23 network
> 26.35.2.255 is a valid host on the 26.35.2.0/23 network
> 152.135.7.0 is a network address
> 17.35.36.0 is a valid host on the 17.35.35.0/23 network
>
This sort of stuff gives me brain-ache :-(
Isn't it:
152.135.7.0 is the valid address and 17.35.36.0 the network address??


Posted by on April 28, 2007, 12:26 pm
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options


> On Sat, 28 Apr 2007 07:12:06 -0400
>
>
>
>
> > > Hi all -I saw this question and cant figure out how to work it out-all
> > > help gratefully appreciated-
> > > The mask used is 255.255.254.0
> > > It asks which of the following 3 addresses can be used-
> > > 113.10.4.0
> > > 186.54.3.0
> > > 175.33.3.255
> > > 26.35.2.255
> > > 152.135.7.0
> > > 17.35.36.0
>
> > > Am I right in thinking the mask allows 510 usable hosts per subnet in
> > > a class C and only 1 host in a Class B?
> > > Thanks alot-I know the answers but dont understand why.
>
> > Yes there are 510 usable hosts in a /23. Classes are really meaningless once
> > you break the /8, /16 or /24 boundry. Example 10.0.0.0/23 is technically a
> > class "A" address, it still contains 510 hosts. 172.16.0.0/23 is technically
> > a class "B" address, it still contains 510 hosts. 192.168.0.0/23 is
> > technically a class "C" address, it still contains 510 hosts.
>
> > When using a /23 mask there is a very quick shortcut you can use. If the 3rd
> > octet is an even number it immeadiately tells you it contains the network
> > address and the rest are valid hosts. If the 3rd octet is an odd number it
> > immeadiately tells you it contains all hosts and the broadcast address.
> > 113.10.4.0 is a network address
> > 186.54.3.0 is a valid host, it belongs to the 186.54.2.0/23 network.
> > 175.33.3.255 is the broadcast address for the 175.33.2.0/23 network
> > 26.35.2.255 is a valid host on the 26.35.2.0/23 network
> > 152.135.7.0 is a network address
> > 17.35.36.0 is a valid host on the 17.35.35.0/23 network
>
> This sort of stuff gives me brain-ache :-(
> Isn't it:
> 152.135.7.0 is the valid address and 17.35.36.0 the network address??


Yep, i was banging my head as well. I concur with your selection.


Similar ThreadsPosted
Subnetting Question February 6, 2005, 11:45 pm
A few subnetting question May 7, 2007, 1:28 pm
Subnetting question May 26, 2007, 9:25 am
CCNA subnetting question April 21, 2005, 5:58 am
subnetting question - pissing me off October 6, 2006, 11:51 am
subnetting question - pissing me off October 6, 2006, 11:51 am
subnetting question - pissing me off October 6, 2006, 11:51 am
Simple Subnetting Question October 30, 2006, 10:48 pm
Another subnetting calculation question...Scott? October 2, 2008, 11:45 am
Question About Subnetting/Todd Lammle CCNA book April 5, 2006, 10:49 am

other useful resources:
The Federal Communications Commission (FCC)
Telecommunications Industry Association
Electronic and Software Security Products and Services
International Telecommunication Union

Custom CGI Perl and PHP programming by 1-Script.com

Contact Us | Privacy Policy
The site map in XML format XML site map