|
Posted by Steve C on February 6, 2005, 11:45 pm
If you were Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
In a class C subnet of 255.255.255.240 are not host xxx.xxx.xxx.001 to
xxx.xxx.xxx.15 invalid? Arnt the first eligable hosts xxx.xxx.xxx.017/28 to
xxx.xxx.xxx.030/28?
thanks
Steve C.
|
|
Posted by Fred Atkinson on February 7, 2005, 12:48 am
If you were Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
That depends upon whether you are running classful or
classless routing. If running classless, it also depends upon whether
or not you have the 'ip subnet-zero' option enabled. If running
classful, not.
Also, with that subnet mask, .15 would be a broadcast address
and cannot be used for a host address.
Fred
|
|
Posted by Todd Lammle on February 7, 2005, 7:25 am
If you were Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
Steve, great question. If you are studying for the Cisco CCNA exam,
then yes, they are now valid. Pre- 2005 exams would have considered
those invalid. As the other posts mention, this is the ip subnet-zero
command, which is on by default starting in IOS version 12.1.
Cheers!
Todd Lammle
|
| Similar Threads | Posted | | Subnetting question? | April 28, 2007, 2:26 am |
| A few subnetting question | May 7, 2007, 1:28 pm |
| Subnetting question | May 26, 2007, 9:25 am |
| CCNA subnetting question | April 21, 2005, 5:58 am |
| subnetting question - pissing me off | October 6, 2006, 11:51 am |
| subnetting question - pissing me off | October 6, 2006, 11:51 am |
| subnetting question - pissing me off | October 6, 2006, 11:51 am |
| Simple Subnetting Question | October 30, 2006, 10:48 pm |
| Another subnetting calculation question...Scott? | October 2, 2008, 11:45 am |
| Question About Subnetting/Todd Lammle CCNA book | April 5, 2006, 10:49 am |
|
|