|
Posted by gregg johnstone on August 12, 2006, 1:44 am
If you were Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
here is Ciscos take on it
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk648/tk361/technologies_tech_note09186a0080093f18.shtml#subnetzero
gregg johnstone wrote:
> Sorry,my fault-that is the correct answer -is it because .11 is the
> first subnet? I always thought you werent allowed to use that subnet?
> Am I correct in thinking 192.168.36.10 ,200.100.16.3 hasnt been
> subnetted and 131.64.16.133 is the 1st usable ?
> TIA
> BernieM wrote:
> > >
> > >> Just tried a few test questions-here was the subnet zero question
> > >> 131.64.16.133 mask /25
> > >> 192.168.36.10 mask /24
> > >> 156.100.11.37 mask /20
> > >> 200.100.16.3 /24
> > >>
> > >> Thanks alot
> > >>
> > >
> > > Where is the question, don't see it....
> > >
> > > The Dude
> > >
> >
> > I think it's "which is an example of a subnet zero". The answer being
> > "156.100.11.37 mask /20".
> >
> > BernieM
|