|
Posted by MC on August 28, 2004, 11:09 pm
If you were Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
case and the other end is not willing to make any changes (I don't think
they know how and do not want to admit it)
Anyway the SAA feature is what I was trying to remember, Read about it
before but forgot. I will check it out and maybe will do the job for now
until I can convince the other end to configure their routers with HSRP.
Unfortunatly due to security reasons we can not run dynamic routing.
Thanks,
MC
> If you did HSRP you could set it up interface tracking and decrement the
> routers priority. This would allow the standby router to preempt the
> current active router when it noticed inactivity on the WAN link.
>
> MC wrote:
> > I have a location that has three routers, One is primary and one is
backup
> > back to another location, The third is default gateway to corporate.
> >
> > They are not using HSRP on the redundant routers and do not want to use
> > dynamic routing protocol between them and the third router.
> >
> > I have static routes point to the redundnat routers from the third
router to
> > get to the remote subnet, higher cost to the backup router. However if
the
> > WAN circuit goes down on the primary router but the LAN interface is
still
> > up the routes never switch of course.
> >
> > Can a Cisco router do a verification to a remote IP gateway IP beyond
the
> > LAN interface to verify the WAN is up or not. Thought could be done
using
> > policy routing but not sure.
> >
> >
> > Thanks,
> > MC
> >
> >
>
| 
Yahoo! 
Google 
Windows Live 
del.icio.us 
digg 
Netscape 
XML site map