|
Posted by Lourdes Alcantara on May 5, 2006, 2:25 am
If you were Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
You can do some sort of load balancing for vpn. You just have to figure
out how do you want to implement your vpn solution. Most VPN boxes use
ipsec or 3des. But you might want to consider using SSL instead so that
you can create more stringent access control rules.
May I recommend checking out www.netifice.com
They provide managed security service. There SSL vpn implementation is I
believe the best in the market.
Bill Grant wrote:
> I would get some expert advice brfore trying to combine two DSL
> connections. It can't be done easily. The problem is that "dialup" style VPN
> traffic needs to use the default gateway, and there can only be one of
> those!
>
> asdf wrote:
>> thank you both for replying. there is something else i forgot to
>> mention though.
>>
>> WE are using DLS and things get kind of slow. If we get a network
>> balancing, end point router
>> and get another dsl connection we would still be able to connect with
>> VPN using both connections.
>> MAybe it's the word tunnel in "VPN tunnel" that's messing me up. But
>> that tunnel can split and go
>> over 2 separate connection?
>>
>> thank you very much for replying.
>>> asdf wrote:
>>>> What are everyone's opinions on running VPN on Server 2003 vs
>>>> running it on a dedicated VPN hardware--like a VPN endpoint router.
>>>>
>>>> We have about 5 people who will be connecting to our network at the
>>>> same time
>>>> mostly transferring large images.
>>>>
>>>> Sales guys claim that hardware will provide us with better
>>>> throughput as opposed
>>>> to running VPN on a server.
>>>>
>>>> thanx
>>>>
>>>>
>>> I run windows server with 100 concurrent vpn clients connected and
>>> there are no performance problems, this was using pptp not
>>> l2tp/ipsec though. For lan to lan tunnels I would always go hardware
>>> vpn though.
>>> simon
>
>
>
|