|
Posted by derSchweiz on April 25, 2007, 11:52 am
If you were Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
I am attempting to load balance across 2 internet connections, one connected
to each fast ethernet interface, and I want to do CEF per-packet round robin
through each of the tunnels. This is primarily for the upstream direction.
>>I am currently trying to build 2 Tunnel Interfaces across 2 different
>>links, with 2 Cisco 2600s. Router 1 is the router with 2 Next-Hop IPs
>>Router 2.
>>
>> This poses a problem, I need to get the tunnel 10's traffic to only go
>> through the 192.168.10.254 (fa0/0) next-hop IP, and tunnel 20's traffic
>> to only go through the 192.168.20.254 (fa0/1) next hop IP. I am stuck
>> because the 2 destinations are the same. Is there any way to accomplish
>> this?
>>
>>
>> Router 1
>> ============
>> Fast Ethernet 0/0 - 192.168.10.1/24
>> Fast Ethernet 0/1 - 192.168.20.1/24
>>
>> ip route 192.168.30.1 255.255.255.255 192.168.10.254
>> ip route 192.168.30.1 255.255.255.255 192.168.20.254
>>
>> interface tunnel 10
>> //some output omitted
>> tunnel-source fastEthernet 0/0
>> tunnel-destination 192.168.30.1
>> !
>>
>> interface tunnel 20
>> //some output omitted
>> tunnel-source fastEthernet 0/1
>> tunnel-destination 192.168.30.1
>> !
>>
>> Router 2
>> ============
>> Fast Ethernet 0/0 - 192.168.30.1/24
>>
>> Thanks in Advance!
>>
>
> Well, the first thought that comes to mind is Policy Based Routing, but
> you haven't really given enough info. Why are you building two tunnels
> from/to the same locations and what makes the distinction of what traffic
> should go through which tunnel?
>
>
| 
Yahoo! 
Google 
Windows Live 
del.icio.us 
digg 
Netscape 
XML site map