Re: [Telecom] AT&T phone books

Re: [Telecom] AT&T phone books

NewsGroups | Search | Tools
 comp.dcom.telecom  Post an article  get this group's latest topics as an RSS feed add this group's latest topics to your My MSN content add this group's latest topics to your My Yahoo content  add this group's latest topics to your Google content  YahooMyWeb Yahoo!  Google Google  Windows Live Favorites Windows Live  del.icio.us del.icio.us  digg digg  Add to Netscape Netscape
Subject Author Date
Re: [Telecom] AT&T phone books hancock4 12-25-2007
Posted by on December 25, 2007, 10:49 pm
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
On Dec 24, 9:56=A0pm, Wesr...@aol.com wrote:

> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0There are other search =A0issues, too. =A0Several month=
s ago, using
> yellowpages.com, I was looking to =A0see if a hotel or motel (name known) =
still
> existed in a small place. =A0It =A0returned 183 listings, many of them 800=
numbers and
> many others 100 miles or =A0more away.

So true. Search engines have weird quirks. The above is a common
problem. By design, many merchants label or tag their listings so as
to appear in as many searches as possible in the hopes of drawing in
more customers. Sometimes the opposite happens--you search the wrong
town name and you DON'T get listings from places very close by because
they're under another town name.

I was searching on Google, using a particular phrase. I put it in
quotes since I only wanted that exact phrase. But Google added
synonyms I did not want, flooding me with unwanted 'matches'.

Also, sometimes you want the word 'and' used in the search, not as a
Boolean operator.

> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 An =A0additional point is that the printed directories=
must be widely
> used or they =A0would not be so profitable as to encourage several publish=
ers
> to produce them =A0for the same area, and for all of them to advertise the=
m
> widely on television =A0and in newspapers.. =A0The directories, as is the =
case of many
> productions, =A0are supported by advertising revenue.

The old Bell System Yellow Pages was very profitable. But AFAIK, that
was never regulated and anyone could put out a "yellow pages" and
charge whatever they wanted for ads. You are correct that if multiple
Yellow Pages (or even White Pages) are published the utlity will
greatly diminish.

But I must admit I'm not a fan of the Yellow Pages since it got
tacky. Maybe my town was late, but I don't like ads for "massage
parlors", nor double page color ads by lawyers "WE WILL GET MONEY FOR
YOU!".


Similar ThreadsPosted
[Telecom] AT&T phone books December 16, 2007, 10:56 am
[Telecom] RE: AT&T phone books December 17, 2007, 9:54 am
[Telecom] Re: AT&T phone books December 18, 2007, 6:54 pm
Re: [Telecom] AT&T phone books December 23, 2007, 7:23 pm
Re: [Telecom] AT&T phone books December 24, 2007, 9:56 pm
Phone Books Are Getting Thinner As Cellphones Take Over June 8, 2007, 5:07 pm
Visionary Telecom Books January 11, 2006, 7:24 am
New Telecom Books Blog Site - www.telecombooksblog.com January 25, 2006, 5:18 pm
Free Access to Online Books June 2, 2006, 8:43 pm
Dave Barry Books on Audiobook Format February 18, 2005, 1:36 pm

other useful resources:
The Federal Communications Commission (FCC)
Telecommunications Industry Association
Electronic and Software Security Products and Services
International Telecommunication Union

Custom CGI Perl and PHP programming by 1-Script.com

Contact Us | Privacy Policy
The site map in XML format XML site map