Re: Tangled up Over DSL - Some Cell Phone Users Demand to Stand

Re: Tangled up Over DSL - Some Cell Phone Users Demand to Stand

NewsGroups | Search | Tools
 comp.dcom.telecom  Post an article  get this group's latest topics as an RSS feed add this group's latest topics to your My MSN content add this group's latest topics to your My Yahoo content  add this group's latest topics to your Google content  YahooMyWeb Yahoo!  Google Google  Windows Live Favorites Windows Live  del.icio.us del.icio.us  digg digg  Add to Netscape Netscape
Subject Author Date
Re: Tangled up Over DSL - Some Cell Phone Users Demand to Stand Steven Lichter 05-24-2005
Posted by Steven Lichter on May 24, 2005, 10:53 pm
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options


Jack Decker wrote:

> http://www.chron.com/cs/CDA/ssistory.mpl/business/3195270

> Some Cell Phone Users Demand to Stand Alone

> By JOHN C. ROPER
> Copyright 2005 Houston Chronicle

> A growing number of U.S. consumers are cutting the cord on traditional
> home telephone service, choosing instead to exclusively use cell
> phones.

> But many of these consumers have found ditching their land-line phone
> service, and its accompanying cost, isn't possible if they want speedy
> DSL, or digital subscriber line, Internet service in their homes.

> Providers such as SBC Communications require customers to buy
> residential phone service to have access to their broadband lines, a
> tactic consumer advocacy groups say is unfair.

> Full story at:
> http://www.chron.com/cs/CDA/ssistory.mpl/business/3195270

> How to Distribute VoIP Throughout a Home:
> http://michigantelephone.mi.org/distribute.html

> If you live in Michigan, subscribe to the MI-Telecom group:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/MI-Telecom/

> [TELECOM Digest Editor's Note: I think I read somewhere -- maybe here
> in the Digest -- where SBC was going to bite the bullet also and
> begin offering 'naked DSL'. Fact or fiction? Personally, I would say
> that _whenever possible_ people just ditch telco and go with cable
> internet. PAT]

They have as well as Verizon, the others will follow. I believe
either the FCC or PUC here in California ordered it.

The only good spammer is a dead one!! Have you hunted one down today?
(c) 2005 I Kill Spammers, Inc. A Rot in Hell Co.



Similar ThreadsPosted
Tangled up Over DSL - Some Cell Phone Users Demand to Stand May 24, 2005, 9:58 am
Re: Tangled up Over DSL - Some Cell Phone Users Demand to Stand May 25, 2005, 6:17 pm
Re: Tangled up Over DSL - Some Cell Phone Users Demand to Stand May 25, 2005, 5:14 pm
FCC: Phone Companies Don't Have to Sell DSL as a Stand-Alone March 28, 2005, 11:10 am
Re: FCC: Phone Companies Don't Have to Sell DSL as a Stand-Alone March 30, 2005, 10:15 am
Cell Phone Users Want Media Services May 26, 2005, 1:06 pm
Is the iPhone an AT&T Time Bomb Against Cell Users? June 29, 2007, 10:32 am
Re: Is the iPhone an AT&T Time Bomb Against Cell Users? June 30, 2007, 9:24 am
Re: Is the iPhone an AT&T Time Bomb Against Cell Users? June 30, 2007, 6:17 pm
Re: Is the iPhone an AT&T Time Bomb Against Cell Users? July 2, 2007, 9:50 am

other useful resources:
The Federal Communications Commission (FCC)
Telecommunications Industry Association
Electronic and Software Security Products and Services
International Telecommunication Union

Custom CGI Perl and PHP programming by 1-Script.com

Contact Us | Privacy Policy
The site map in XML format XML site map