Re: Maximum throughput of 3,640?

Re: Maximum throughput of 3,640?

NewsGroups | Search | Tools
 comp.dcom.sys.cisco  Post an article  get this group's latest topics as an RSS feed add this group's latest topics to your My MSN content add this group's latest topics to your My Yahoo content  add this group's latest topics to your Google content  YahooMyWeb Yahoo!  Google Google  Windows Live Favorites Windows Live  del.icio.us del.icio.us  digg digg  Add to Netscape Netscape
Subject Author Date
Re: Maximum throughput of 3,640? Bod43 11-05-2006
Posted by on November 5, 2006, 5:45 pm
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options

Joop van der Velden wrote:
> Yehavi Bourvine (58-4279) wrote:
>
> > I have a Cisco-3,640 with dual FastEthernet card. It does routing between
the
> > two interfaces, and I've found that at 50Mb/sec the CPU usage is 100% (most
of
> > it in interrupt mode). I've enabled CEF and IP ROUTE-CACHE, removed the
access
> > lists but it still the same bottleneck. Is this the maximum that this router
> > can get to?
>
> Yep. See for example:
> http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/765/tools/quickreference/routerperformance.pdf

Above is an excellent document.

How much is not at interrupt level?

Check that you are not doing unnecesary local routing.
i.e. maybe allow ICMP Redirects.

On a hard pressed router make sure that it is not getting hit
with a lot of broadcasts. For many purposes you can filter
all IP broadcasts with an ACL (maybe you need to allow DHCP).

access-list might be

permit dhcp (don't know exact command right now)
deny ip any host 255.255.255.255
deny in any host x.x.z.255 ! x.y.z for local subnet
permit ip any any


Might be worth trying CEF and plain fast switching.



conf t

! for CEF

ip cef ! or os if just cef?

int fast x
ip router-cache cef
! repeat for all interfaces

! for fast switching

conf t
no ip cef

int fast x
no ip route-cache cef
ip route-cache
! repeat for all interfaces

I know that some people assume that CEF is best but
if it were me I would check.

As mentioned by me a few minutes ago in another thread
try to get rid of buffer allocations and frees.

If you like post
sh buffers

I now do not hesitate to increase buffers manually to prevent
misses and failures provided that there is SUFFICIENT
MEMORY if I suspect that a router is under any kind of stress
and shows significant misses or failures.

3640 is not a fast router by current standards.
>From the posted link

50,000 - 70,000pps 25.6 - 36Mbps

These are very conservative numbers since Cisco assume
64byte packets and to get 200Mbps
(i.e. Full Duplex 100M) you will need an average packet size of

(200,000,000/8)/50,000 bytes = 500 bytes


Similar ThreadsPosted
Maximum throughput of 3,640? November 5, 2006, 5:43 am
cannot set dns maximum-length July 31, 2006, 6:03 pm
Maximum active IPSec sessions October 11, 2005, 6:38 am
Maximum Incoming Sessions on PIX501 June 10, 2007, 5:27 am
1721 Maximum memory SDRAM July 23, 2008, 12:20 pm
pix - who consumes my throughput ? March 15, 2005, 2:49 pm
Need help understanding throughput March 8, 2006, 5:23 pm
Gigabit Throughput November 23, 2006, 12:42 am
Throttling Throughput February 28, 2007, 8:01 am
pix501 throughput January 6, 2008, 5:42 am

other useful resources:
The Federal Communications Commission (FCC)
Telecommunications Industry Association
Electronic and Software Security Products and Services
International Telecommunication Union

Custom CGI Perl and PHP programming by 1-Script.com

Contact Us | Privacy Policy
The site map in XML format XML site map