IP PBX Advice (Nortel, Avaya, Mitel, Cisco)

IP PBX Advice (Nortel, Avaya, Mitel, Cisco)

NewsGroups | Search | Tools
 comp.dcom.voice-over-ip  Post an article  get this group's latest topics as an RSS feed add this group's latest topics to your My MSN content add this group's latest topics to your My Yahoo content  add this group's latest topics to your Google content  YahooMyWeb Yahoo!  Google Google  Windows Live Favorites Windows Live  del.icio.us del.icio.us  digg digg  Add to Netscape Netscape
Subject Author Date
IP PBX Advice (Nortel, Avaya, Mitel, Cisco) bigbrorpi 10-15-2005
`--> Notify pump97311-25-2005
Posted by on October 15, 2005, 7:15 pm
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
Hey all -

I'm evaluating IP PBX's for a small site (20 or so users), but
reliability is key (business is almost 100% dependent on the phones
being up). We will be growing in the next year, and possibly with
remote sites. Our vmail needs are simple and we don't need unified
messaging or any type of call center applications (I don't foresee them
in the future either).

I've looked at the Shoretel product, the Nortel BCM, the Avaya IP
Office, the Mitell 3300 series and a Cisco Call Manager. I looked at
CME, but TAC doesn't officially support QSIG on CME and I absolutely
need QSIG capability.

Right now, my favorites are Mitel and Cisco. I've read a lot of
positive newsgroup postings about both, but it seems like upgrades of
CM down the road are a mess. Basically what's important is
functionality, ease of management, and most importantly,
reliability/uptime.

I'm just looking for some peer advice/feedback instead of listening to
my various VARs talk their product up and put down the competition.

Thanks!
B



Posted by on October 16, 2005, 4:25 pm
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
I work for a network integrator that carries both Cisco and ShoreTel.
If are comparing the two for your needs then ShoreTEl is a far better
choise. First of all you mentioned Qsig which ShoreTel does support.
CME is basically dial tone replacement and isn't easy to manage and
upgrades are nasty. You should take another look at ShoreTel for sure.



Posted by on October 16, 2005, 4:25 pm
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
I work for a network integrator that carries both Cisco and ShoreTel.
If are comparing the two for your needs then ShoreTEl is a far better
choise. First of all you mentioned Qsig which ShoreTel does support.
CME is basically dial tone replacement and isn't easy to manage and
upgrades are nasty. You should take another look at ShoreTel for sure.



Posted by on October 16, 2005, 4:35 pm
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
We are using multiple Mitel 3300's and multiple Mitel SX200_ICP systems
(both with Q.SIG) and have been very well satisfied with the product. The
SX200_ICP systems are being used as end nodes, going into small offices
with 50 or less employees and very minimal trunking requirements (no
trunk-to-trunk requirements). The 3300s are going into larger offices and
in locations where we need inter-machine (tandem) trunking.

Mitel's 3300-CXi product might be ideal for your application.

What will you be using the Q.SIG for?

bigbrorpi@gmail.com writes:

>Hey all -

>I'm evaluating IP PBX's for a small site (20 or so users), but
>reliability is key (business is almost 100% dependent on the phones
>being up). We will be growing in the next year, and possibly with
>remote sites. Our vmail needs are simple and we don't need unified
>messaging or any type of call center applications (I don't foresee them
>in the future either).

>I've looked at the Shoretel product, the Nortel BCM, the Avaya IP
>Office, the Mitell 3300 series and a Cisco Call Manager. I looked at
>CME, but TAC doesn't officially support QSIG on CME and I absolutely
>need QSIG capability.

>Right now, my favorites are Mitel and Cisco. I've read a lot of
>positive newsgroup postings about both, but it seems like upgrades of
>CM down the road are a mess. Basically what's important is
>functionality, ease of management, and most importantly,
>reliability/uptime.

>I'm just looking for some peer advice/feedback instead of listening to
>my various VARs talk their product up and put down the competition.

>Thanks!
>B


Posted by on October 16, 2005, 11:23 am
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
The Q.SIG is for integration with a trading turret system.
Thanks for the comments!



Similar ThreadsPosted
Nortel BCM Vs Avaya IP Office May 19, 2005, 3:36 pm
Which PBX to choose? Avaya or Cisco? July 8, 2008, 12:01 pm
Which PBX to choose? Avaya or Cisco? July 8, 2008, 5:58 pm
Cisco-2,811 PRI/Q.sig to Nortel TX-1 January 23, 2007, 8:21 am
Cisco to acquire Nortel? October 13, 2005, 7:30 am
Nortel PBX - Cisco phone July 10, 2008, 4:02 am
Nortel CS1500 and Cisco Ip Phones / Asterisk December 17, 2007, 12:01 pm
PRI b-channel LCKO problem between Cisco VOIP Gateway and Nortel 61C April 20, 2005, 10:17 am
Business VoIP Solutions Using Cisco Gateways, Cisco Call Agent, And Cisco IP Phones October 2, 2007, 8:06 pm
Avaya and NAT October 23, 2006, 4:57 am

other useful resources:
The Federal Communications Commission (FCC)
Telecommunications Industry Association
Electronic and Software Security Products and Services
International Telecommunication Union

Custom CGI Perl and PHP programming by 1-Script.com

Contact Us | Privacy Policy
The site map in XML format XML site map