Re: Hello, You're in the Dead Zone / Region's Cellphone Users Still

Re: Hello, You're in the Dead Zone / Region's Cellphone Users Still

NewsGroups | Search | Tools
 comp.dcom.telecom  Post an article  get this group's latest topics as an RSS feed add this group's latest topics to your My MSN content add this group's latest topics to your My Yahoo content  add this group's latest topics to your Google content  YahooMyWeb Yahoo!  Google Google  Windows Live Favorites Windows Live  del.icio.us del.icio.us  digg digg  Add to Netscape Netscape
Subject Author Date
Re: Hello, You're in the Dead Zone / Region's Cellphone Users Still hancock4 01-31-2006
Posted by on January 31, 2006, 10:15 am
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
Monty Solomon wrote:

> You've been trapped. In a cellphone dead zone.

Apparently digital signals used today aren't as "enrobing" as analog
signals and are more easily blocked by buildings or terrain. After a
big push to switch people to digital dead zone complaints soared. The
wireless carriers have to put a lot more antennas in and study tricky
locations to ensure continual service.

Public safety departments using new digital radios have had the same
problem with dead spots. Their old analog sets were more reliable.

I was riding a train and the other passengers lost their signal. My
old analog phone kept working.

In more remote areas people use older style "bag phones" with a higher
powered analog signal to have service. Apparently there is no
replacement for this yet, and analog is supposed to be retired in a
few years, which will leave rural areas in big trouble.

As a user, I'm concerned that if I take a motor trip, and go a few
miles off the main highway to an isolated area, that I'll lose service
at a point where I'll need it the most in an emergency.

How far will today's tiny little phones work away from the antenna?

[TELECOM Digest Editor's Note: I think rural areas are _already_ in
some trouble. Cingular Wireless is really trying hard to get all
customers converted over to GSM and the flimsy little phones. On my
older style Nokia phone which I used, quite successfully until a few
months ago, I _always_ had a great signal. The local agent told me
that the newer Nokia 6010 phone (GSM) would be 'much better'. I got it
and turned it on, and only rarely does the signal strengh approach the
level the old one does. GSM is _not_ a better deal at all. I suppose
if you wanted to use it fo (very limited) Internet stuff, watch
television or take photos, etc it would be okay, but how about those
of us who just want to make/recieve good quality phone calls? PAT]


Similar ThreadsPosted
Hello, You're in the Dead Zone / Region's Cellphone Users Still January 30, 2006, 1:53 am
Re: Hello, You're in the Dead Zone / Region's Cellphone Users Still January 30, 2006, 8:03 pm
Re: Hello, You're in the Dead Zone / Region's Cellphone Users Still January 31, 2006, 8:15 pm
Re: Hello, You're in the Dead Zone / Region's Cellphone Users Still January 31, 2006, 9:07 pm
Cellphone Dead? AA Batteries to the Rescue! October 9, 2006, 2:50 pm
Re: Cellphone Dead? AA Batteries to the Rescue! October 11, 2006, 7:38 pm
Re: Cellphone Dead? AA Batteries to the Rescue! October 15, 2006, 10:53 am
Dead zones frustrate drivers / Cellphone service lags in tunnels April 12, 2008, 10:19 am
Re: "Vibranxiety" Afflicts Many Cellphone Users June 21, 2007, 9:26 am
Re: "Vibranxiety" Afflicts Many Cellphone Users June 21, 2007, 9:58 pm

other useful resources:
The Federal Communications Commission (FCC)
Telecommunications Industry Association
Electronic and Software Security Products and Services
International Telecommunication Union

Custom CGI Perl and PHP programming by 1-Script.com

Contact Us | Privacy Policy
The site map in XML format XML site map