|
Posted by Steven Lichter on June 19, 2005, 1:12 pm
If you were Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
The city Of Riverside, Calif. tried to do this about 15 yeara ago, it
caused a firestorm, at the time most that had cell phones did not even
use them in the city, but just had a billing address, they dropped it
and as of yet have not tried that again.
Joseph wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Jun 2005 23:22:21 -0500, Lisa Minter
>> By Robert MacMillan
>> Special to The Washington Post
>> Using a cell phone is Alexandria is about to become more expensive --
>> $3 a month more expensive.
> If you copied this you sure didn't proofread it. If the original
> article was like this they didn't bother to proof it either!
> On Thu, 16 Jun 2005 23:22:21 -0500, Lisa Minter
>> The City Council approved a new tax on cell phones as part of the
>> fiscal 2006 budget. It will help make up some of the money that the
>> city will lose after the real estate tax rate was lowered in order to
>> provide relief to homeowners.
> Can we say telephone gravy train? This is about typical though isn't
> it?
The only good spammer is a dead one!! Have you hunted one down today?
(c) 2005 I Kill Spammers, Inc. A Rot in Hell Co.
| 
Yahoo! 
Google 
Windows Live 
del.icio.us 
digg 
Netscape 
XML site map