Re: Autonegotiation @ 100 / 1000BASE-T - why in another sublayer of PHY

Re: Autonegotiation @ 100 / 1000BASE-T - why in another sublayer of PHY

NewsGroups | Search | Tools
 comp.dcom.lans.ethernet  Post an article  get this group's latest topics as an RSS feed add this group's latest topics to your My MSN content add this group's latest topics to your My Yahoo content  add this group's latest topics to your Google content  YahooMyWeb Yahoo!  Google Google  Windows Live Favorites Windows Live  del.icio.us del.icio.us  digg digg  Add to Netscape Netscape
Subject Author Date
Re: Autonegotiation @ 100 / 1000BASE-T - why in another sublayer of PHY Rick Jones 03-15-2007
Posted by Rick Jones on March 15, 2007, 5:23 pm
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options


> little question, that does not find it's answer in google (no matter
> of what angle I strike it) - in 100BASE-TX, autonegotiation function
> is placed just before the RJ-45 (MDI), under the PMD (physical
> medium dependent - at the bottom of PHY), and then - in 1000BASE-T
> it is defined as a functional block of PCS (physical coding sublayer
> - at the top of PHY).

> Simple q: W H Y ? ? ?

I'm not sure it is an/the answer, but autoneg in 100BT was (at least
initially) optional. I don't think it was ever optional in 1000BT.
Perhaps that has something to do with where it is placed? I suspect
the folks over in comp.dcom.lans.ethernet would know.

rick jones
--
Wisdom Teeth are impacted, people are affected by the effects of events.
these opinions are mine, all mine; HP might not want them anyway... :)
feel free to post, OR email to rick.jones2 in hp.com but NOT BOTH...

Pure Networks
Posted by banan on March 15, 2007, 6:13 pm
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options


> I'm not sure it is an/the answer, but autoneg in 100BT was (at least
> initially) optional. I don't think it was ever optional in 1000BT.
> Perhaps that has something to do with where it is placed? I suspect
> the folks over in comp.dcom.lans.ethernet would know.

Thanks, will go there and check out.

bio



Posted by glen herrmannsfeldt on March 15, 2007, 7:32 pm
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options


banan wrote:
>>I'm not sure it is an/the answer, but autoneg in 100BT was (at least
>>initially) optional. I don't think it was ever optional in 1000BT.
>>Perhaps that has something to do with where it is placed? I suspect
>>the folks over in comp.dcom.lans.ethernet would know.

> Thanks, will go there and check out.

I don't believe that it existed at the beginning of 100baseTX.

I used to have a 3C250 (bought cheap on eBay), one of the original
100baseTX repeaters. No 10baseT mode, but it does make a good
door stop.

-- glen


Similar ThreadsPosted
autonegotiation and media converters August 23, 2005, 4:26 pm
Which Layer 2 sublayer participates in encapsulation, and framing October 24, 2007, 10:23 pm

other useful resources:
The Federal Communications Commission (FCC)
Telecommunications Industry Association
Electronic and Software Security Products and Services
International Telecommunication Union

Custom CGI Perl and PHP programming by 1-Script.com

Contact Us | Privacy Policy
The site map in XML format XML site map