RR modem quuestion

RR modem quuestion

NewsGroups | Search | Tools
 comp.dcom.modems.cable  Post an article  get this group's latest topics as an RSS feed add this group's latest topics to your My MSN content add this group's latest topics to your My Yahoo content  add this group's latest topics to your Google content  YahooMyWeb Yahoo!  Google Google  Windows Live Favorites Windows Live  del.icio.us del.icio.us  digg digg  Add to Netscape Netscape
Subject Author Date
RR modem quuestion lars 05-11-2006
Posted by Eric on May 13, 2006, 10:39 am
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
"I am asking if the telephony is totally outside and has no impact on
the
interent.. or viceversa... "

Well, the answer depends on what they using. For the past several
years, phone over cable systems were switched digital phone systems.
The cable company would mount a box called a NIU or some other acronym,
that would have a cable connection and a phone wire block. It would
connect to the cable drop before anything else on the line and pass
through signal for television or internet. This would connect to a 5ESS
switch, just like the baby bells use, and was switched data, meaning
64Kbps all the time. It uses different upstream and downstream
bandwidth from the Internet traffic. They were sometimes powered by the
cable system, sometimes from a battery backup on site.

Now, many cable companies are moving to VoIP systems that run on the
current Internet infrastructure they've built for the high speed
internet. They use a special cable modem that has 2 phone jacks on the
back, next to the Ethernet and USB ports:
http://www.arrisi.com/products_solutions/product_families/Touchstone/telephony_modems.asp
http://broadband.motorola.com/catalog/productdetail.asp?ProductID=388
These do share the bandwidth used in the house, usually not that much
though. They also require a battery backup for lifeline service, which
at some point may stop working and I'm sure will requie a technician to
come out and replace.

The best thing to do is call in and ask what all is involved in an
installation. In some areas I'm sure they are running both systems at
the same time, with the idea of eliminating the switched service at
some point, so that's yet another thing to consider.


Pure Networks
Posted by John Gray on May 13, 2006, 12:00 pm
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options

> "I am asking if the telephony is totally outside and has no impact on
> the
> interent.. or viceversa... "
>
> Well, the answer depends on what they using. For the past several
> years, phone over cable systems were switched digital phone systems.
> The cable company would mount a box called a NIU or some other
> acronym, that would have a cable connection and a phone wire block.
> It would connect to the cable drop before anything else on the line
> and pass through signal for television or internet. This would
> connect to a 5ESS switch, just like the baby bells use, and was
> switched data, meaning 64Kbps all the time. It uses different
> upstream and downstream bandwidth from the Internet traffic. They
> were sometimes powered by the cable system, sometimes from a battery
> backup on site.
>
> Now, many cable companies are moving to VoIP systems that run on the
> current Internet infrastructure they've built for the high speed
> internet. They use a special cable modem that has 2 phone jacks on
> the back, next to the Ethernet and USB ports:
> http://www.arrisi.com/products_solutions/product_families/Touchstone/t
> elephony_modems.asp
> http://broadband.motorola.com/catalog/productdetail.asp?ProductID=388
> These do share the bandwidth used in the house, usually not that much
> though. They also require a battery backup for lifeline service,
> which at some point may stop working and I'm sure will requie a
> technician to come out and replace.

I recently had TW Digitalphone(VoIP) installed. The modem is the
Motorola SBV5220 on the site linked to above. TW didn't install the
batteries, nor provide them. When I called, they stated that they
weren't installing them in any of their installations as during a power
outage the network would probably be down anyway.

I am behind a NAT router and my internet IP didn't change. The modem is
between the TW cable and the router. I think(don't know) that the modem
issues two IPs so perhaps the bandwidth isn't shared. I do know that if
the phone is in use, I can still download a huge file from a fast server
as fast as before. Granted, that is just a subjective observation with
no measurement other than Firefox's Download window showing 768KB during
download. RR is capped here at 7Mbit down, 384Kb up. Again, I'm
guessing on all this.

Also, TW is doing something a little different with their VoIP. The
phone call is handled by TW network initially, but is routed the either
MCI or Sprint for the majority of the call over their phone network. I
think that virtually all phone companies do VoIP after a certain point
on their network, so as to reduce the cost of long distance calls. That
way they avoid a dedicated connection spanning a long distance.


> The best thing to do is call in and ask what all is involved in an
> installation. In some areas I'm sure they are running both systems at
> the same time, with the idea of eliminating the switched service at
> some point, so that's yet another thing to consider.
>
>


Posted by Eric on May 13, 2006, 12:51 pm
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
"When I called, they stated that they
weren't installing them in any of their installations as during a power
outage the network would probably be down anyway. "

Wow. Yet another chance for the bells to market negitive preceptions
about cable, this time about network uptime and lifeline service. I
find it very iresponsible of TW to sell a VoIP service that doesn't
have any power backup available, if this statement is true.

Unfortunatly, since most of the world thinks of cable as unreliable
(reputation deserved in some cases), I'll get to read years of "cable
telephone goes down all the time, so the bells service is fundamentally
superior" postings in the newsgroups, just like I got to read years of
"cable internet service is slower the more people are on it, while DSL
is DEDICATED(?) back to the CO and therefore is superior" comments just
because @Home corporation didn't want to get a decent circuit to their
backbone and some clever marketing campaigns to exploit the flaw.
Hopefully the CSSR the poster spoke with was misinformed, but who knows
for sure. There is a chance that this is a localized problem, maybe the
local office ran out of battery packs or something.


Posted by John Gray on May 13, 2006, 7:35 pm
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
@v46g2000cwv.googlegroups.com:

> "When I called, they stated that they
> weren't installing them in any of their installations as during a
power
> outage the network would probably be down anyway. "
>
> Wow. Yet another chance for the bells to market negitive preceptions
> about cable, this time about network uptime and lifeline service. I
> find it very iresponsible of TW to sell a VoIP service that doesn't
> have any power backup available, if this statement is true.
>
> Unfortunatly, since most of the world thinks of cable as unreliable
> (reputation deserved in some cases), I'll get to read years of "cable
> telephone goes down all the time, so the bells service is
fundamentally
> superior" postings in the newsgroups, just like I got to read years of
> "cable internet service is slower the more people are on it, while DSL
> is DEDICATED(?) back to the CO and therefore is superior" comments
just
> because @Home corporation didn't want to get a decent circuit to their
> backbone and some clever marketing campaigns to exploit the flaw.
> Hopefully the CSSR the poster spoke with was misinformed, but who
knows
> for sure. There is a chance that this is a localized problem, maybe
the
> local office ran out of battery packs or something.
>

I personally don't think it is much of an issue. When Northeastern US
had the major power outage a few years ago in mid summer, everything
went down. Where I live, the power came back on within less than 2
hours while in other areas it took several days to return to service.

I could get on the internet via RR as soon as power returned, but the
phone was still down for several hours. This was a regular POTS line
from Verizon. So much for their claims.

I did consider purchasing the batteries fro Motorola myself, but my wife
and I have cell phones, which of course may or may not work. TW and the
cell phones have E9ll services. Vonage and some of the others
supposedly still don't. After a certain date, without E911 such
services were to stop service but there was a waiver.??



Posted by Agent_C on May 13, 2006, 7:45 pm
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
wrote:

> This was a regular POTS line from Verizon.
> So much for their claims.

It's interesting how that apparently varies by region. In New York
City, voice circuits were fully functional during the 1965, 1977 and
2003 blackouts.

A_C






Similar ThreadsPosted
Old modem vs new modem? August 24, 2006, 6:39 pm
Powerline modem February 7, 2005, 4:35 am
Do I need a new cable modem? February 15, 2005, 12:00 pm
S. atlanta modem March 7, 2005, 10:19 pm
what cable modem to ge March 30, 2005, 7:15 am
RCA modem diagnostics - anything bad? March 30, 2005, 5:31 pm
Modem recomend August 31, 2005, 3:35 pm
cable modem November 21, 2005, 10:55 pm
Modem problem? January 22, 2006, 2:13 pm
cable modem May 14, 2006, 9:52 am

other useful resources:
The Federal Communications Commission (FCC)
Telecommunications Industry Association
Electronic and Software Security Products and Services
International Telecommunication Union

Custom CGI Perl and PHP programming by 1-Script.com

Contact Us | Privacy Policy
The site map in XML format XML site map