Public IP Address for Device behind Cable/DSL Modem

Public IP Address for Device behind Cable/DSL Modem

NewsGroups | Search | Tools
 comp.dcom.modems.cable  Post an article  get this group's latest topics as an RSS feed add this group's latest topics to your My MSN content add this group's latest topics to your My Yahoo content  add this group's latest topics to your Google content  YahooMyWeb Yahoo!  Google Google  Windows Live Favorites Windows Live  del.icio.us del.icio.us  digg digg  Add to Netscape Netscape
Subject Author Date
Public IP Address for Device behind Cable/DSL Modem gabovitche 05-28-2007
Posted by Warren H on May 28, 2007, 5:51 pm
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
Elmo P. Shagnasty wrote:
> Warren H wrote:
>
>> What the hell is a "control device" or "controller"? Since their
>> getting
>> IP addresses, can we assume they're actually routers?
>
> he said "building control devices". I presume he meant
> security-oriented pieces--door controllers, alarm controllers, HVAC
> controllers, whatever.



Hmm. Never thought of that.

In that case, they're just another computer. Nothing more. No reason to
distinguish them from any other computer using a proprietary operating
system. Why bother confusing the issue by giving them a special name
that has no significance in the world of networking?

But that still doesn't materially change the answer. If they all have
public IP addresses, the route between them still goes back to the CMTS
or the DSLAM, and it they aren't properly submitted, they still won't be
able to talk to each other. And they'll still be exposed to the public
Internet for anyone to hack into.

If they need to communicate with each other, the only practical way to
do it is put them behind a single router, and give them private IP
addresses. If you need to access them individually from the outside
world, some kind of master control unit would also need to be on the LAN
side of the router with them, and a VPN tunnel set-up to access it from
the outside.

--
Warren H.

==========
Disclaimer: My views reflect those of myself, and not my
employer, my friends, nor (as she often tells me) my wife.
Any resemblance to the views of anybody living or dead is
coincidental. No animals were hurt in the writing of this
response -- unless you count my dog who desperately wants
to go outside now.

Maintain your landscape with Black & Decker:
http://www.holzemville.com/mall/blackanddecker




Pure Networks
Posted by on May 28, 2007, 7:22 pm
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
>
>
>Elmo P. Shagnasty wrote:
>> Warren H wrote:
>>
>>> What the hell is a "control device" or "controller"? Since their
>>> getting
>>> IP addresses, can we assume they're actually routers?
>>
>> he said "building control devices". I presume he meant
>> security-oriented pieces--door controllers, alarm controllers, HVAC
>> controllers, whatever.
>
>
>
>Hmm. Never thought of that.
>
>In that case, they're just another computer. Nothing more. No reason to
>distinguish them from any other computer using a proprietary operating
>system. Why bother confusing the issue by giving them a special name
>that has no significance in the world of networking?

Precisely.


>But that still doesn't materially change the answer. If they all have
>public IP addresses, the route between them still goes back to the CMTS
>or the DSLAM, and it they aren't properly submitted, they still won't be
>able to talk to each other. And they'll still be exposed to the public
>Internet for anyone to hack into.
>
>If they need to communicate with each other, the only practical way to
>do it is put them behind a single router, and give them private IP
>addresses. If you need to access them individually from the outside
>world, some kind of master control unit would also need to be on the LAN
>side of the router with them, and a VPN tunnel set-up to access it from
>the outside.

Many types of devices allow network control. This is typically done via
http. Most cable internet services do not permit you to run your *own*
servers. Devices with web control are, technically, servers. Also, the
cable and DSL services block port 80 and other well know server ports.

If the address is dynamically assigned, there needs to be some way to de-
termine that address from the outside. I'm no certain that it would be
easy to have multiple devices listening on the same port behind a router
unless the router can map one visible external port to the a particular
address on the inside network such as:

a.b.c.d:8080 -> 192.168.1.2:80
a.b.c.d:8081 -> 192.168.1.3:80
a.b.c.d:8082 -> 192.168.1.4:80

Can the typical Linksys-like router box do such?

--
VAXman- A Bored Certified VMS Kernel Mode Hacker VAXman(at)TMESIS(dot)COM

"Well my son, life is like a beanstalk, isn't it?"

Similar ThreadsPosted
Linksys WCG200 Cable Modem/Router Device September 6, 2006, 10:52 am
2 Public IP Addresses on 1 Cable Modem March 16, 2006, 1:47 pm
Question re public ip's March 19, 2006, 6:52 pm
Comcast customers: Use Public DNS Servers instead of Comcast's April 14, 2005, 1:38 am
cable modem mac address March 22, 2006, 10:41 pm
cloning a mac address in a cable modem October 10, 2005, 8:25 am
ID IP Address of Cable Modem Hooked to Linksys Router September 24, 2006, 10:54 am
No IP address? Doh July 5, 2007, 4:47 pm
IP Address Location February 2, 2008, 2:38 pm
Two Cable Modems/One IP address? February 7, 2005, 8:45 am

other useful resources:
The Federal Communications Commission (FCC)
Telecommunications Industry Association
Electronic and Software Security Products and Services
International Telecommunication Union

Custom CGI Perl and PHP programming by 1-Script.com

Contact Us | Privacy Policy
The site map in XML format XML site map