|
Posted by Rick Merrill on February 7, 2005, 8:58 pm
If you were Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
Don Lancaster wrote:
> Jim Thompson wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 07 Feb 2005 23:00:32 GMT, Joerg
>>
>>
>>> Hello Rick,
>>>
>>>
>>>> If you have a EE PHD from MIT, go for it. Do you realize that the
>>>> high fequency transmission characteristics of most peoples
>>>> "powerline" changes constantly and essentially randomly? - RM
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> For power metering it seems that the OP only needs a very narrow
>>> channel bandwidth. The challenge will be mostly in the analog and
>>> filter design arena but it can be done. Then, of course, there are
>>> the transformers that need to be bridged.
>>>
>>> Regards, Joerg
>>>
>>> http://www.analogconsultants.com
>>
>>
>>
>> The two remote electric power measurement schemes I know of:
>>
>> (1) RF transmitter at your meter, "neighborhood" receiver located on a
>> pole, then connection to phone lines.
>>
>> (2) Modem connection between your meter and *your* phone line. Power
>> company polls your modem.
>>
>> ...Jim Thompson
>
>
> I guess I was involved in the earliest of powerline carrier
> communications. Back in 1961 at Femco.
>
> It did not work then and it will not work now.
>
> Ferinstance, an ancient Diablo 630 printer has such a good noise filter
> that it takes out any X-10 device within 200 feet.
>
There is work that has used cell phone methods to dynamically adapt the
power frequency to fit the power line characteristics. Remember, anytime
an expert says something can be done, he/she is probably right; and
anytime an expert says something can not be done, he/she is probably
wrong. - Rm
|