|
Posted by Doc Oakenfold on January 4, 2005, 8:44 am
If you were Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
Hi All.
Got a wierd issue here, I'm hoping someone has seen this one.
I've got a Cisco 837 Router, running IOS 12.3(7)XR3.
I have a DSL connection through Bellsouth, connecting through a Dialer
interface.
I have currently configured port forwarding to allow PC Anywhere
traffic from the internet into a specific inside host. After applying
the Access-List and NAT statements, port-forwarding works as it should.
I have no trouble accessing the inside hosts via PC Anywhere. When the
router is rebooted, upon the successful boot, I am no longer able to
connect remotly using PC Anywhere. I go into config mode and remove the
NAT statements and immediatly reapply, NAT is working again and I can
again connect remotly using PC Anywhere. Another reload of the router
confirms the same symptoms, and again, reapplying the NAT statements
fixes the issue.
I have a static IP address that is aquired during PPPoE negotiation.
This means, I don't assign the IP address to the Dialer, I have "ip
address negotiated" on the dialer.
Here are my pertinant nat statements:
ip nat inside source list 1 interface Dialer0 overload
ip nat inside source static tcp 10.255.1.123 5631 interface Dialer0
5631
ip nat inside source static udp 10.255.1.123 5632 interface Dialer0
5632
Any thoughts?
|
  | |
Posted by on January 4, 2005, 10:59 am
If you were Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
well both XR1 and XR2 were deferred, so I would suggest seeing if
another 12.3 stream will support your 837
|
|
Posted by Doc Oakenfold on January 4, 2005, 11:12 am
If you were Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
the current XR release because it provides some functionality the
other streams don't, i.e. it allows us to add a DMZ port to the router
by creating an Ethernet2 and having it associated with FastEthernet4.
This of course is a new feature only introduces a couple of months
back. Unfortunatly, this feature is a requrement. I'm afraid I might be
dealing with a bug.
I've got a case open with Cisco TAC, but wondered if anyone and seen
this.
Thanks.
|
|
Posted by rave on January 5, 2005, 6:13 pm
If you were Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
can u send me the info for show ver.
i am a guy from Cisco TAC.
|
| Similar Threads | Posted | | Cisco 837 VPN, NAT and Port Forwarding | February 27, 2005, 7:11 pm |
| Port Forwarding with Cisco 871?? | September 25, 2005, 9:58 am |
| cisco pix 515 port forwarding - NOT possible? hard to believe.. | July 27, 2005, 12:23 am |
| Cisco 871 router port forwarding | July 12, 2006, 8:41 pm |
| Cisco PIX 501 port forwarding trouble | September 24, 2006, 10:32 am |
| port mapping or forwarding on Cisco Pix 506E | August 5, 2005, 1:30 pm |
| Port forwarding from cisco 2600 to ASA-5510 | July 20, 2006, 10:23 am |
| HELP With Cisco PIX 506E routing/port forwarding with SMTP????? | July 23, 2004, 11:16 am |
| Cisco 2600 + DSL + Cable -> Failover and port forwarding | July 2, 2008, 12:47 am |
| Port forwarding | February 2, 2006, 3:05 pm |
|
|
Yahoo! 
Google 
Windows Live 
del.icio.us 
digg 
Netscape 
XML site map