|
Posted by darktiger on November 13, 2005, 7:38 pm
If you were Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
Hello,
Firstly, I have searched this group over - but can't find the exact
details.
Here is the situation:
Two ISPs, one gives 12.zzz.xxx.0/24 to us, and the other just gives us
206.yy.xxx.30. I want all traffic from our network that has a private
IP to be NAT/PAT'ed out the port with the single IP & the people with
public IPs to go out the port with the /24 subnet/
I have a Cisco 3640 router connected to a 2950 switch.
Fa0/0 and S0/0 are used for the two ISPs, Fa0/1 is my trunk port with
sub-ints to my switch for VLAN routing, so I have Fa0/1.10, .20, .30,
etc...
Now, where do I place my: ip policy route-map?
On Fa0/1 or on each Fa0/1.nn?
Thanks! I have never used route maps before...
|

| |
Posted by Merv on November 13, 2005, 7:46 pm
If you were Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
policy-based routing is enabled on router ingress interfaces
|
|
Posted by darktiger on November 13, 2005, 7:52 pm
If you were Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options Ingress interfaces would be Fa0/0 and S0/0 which are connected to my
ISP's, correct?
|
|
Posted by Maarten Carels on November 14, 2005, 4:27 am
If you were Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
> Ingress interfaces would be Fa0/0 and S0/0 which are connected to my
> ISP's, correct?
No, Ingress means where the traffic to be policy routed origins from.
So your Fa0/1.* (all of them)
(If you think what policy routing does, it makes sense).
--maarten
|
|
Posted by Merv on November 14, 2005, 7:06 am
If you were Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options You would place the policy on the routers FA0/1.n which are the ingress
interfaces for your outbound traffic to your ISP's.
|
| Similar Threads | Posted | | policy based routing for multiple tracking options question | April 9, 2006, 8:42 pm |
| Policy Based Routing | April 6, 2005, 9:20 am |
| PIX 7.0 policy based routing? | October 24, 2005, 10:27 pm |
| policy based routing | November 4, 2005, 2:14 am |
| Policy based routing on a ASA | February 2, 2007, 5:03 pm |
| PIX 525, I think I need Policy-based routing?? | April 23, 2007, 9:45 pm |
| Policy based routing | April 30, 2008, 11:30 am |
| Policy Based Routing and/or NAT | May 7, 2008, 8:15 am |
| policy based routing problem | March 22, 2005, 11:03 am |
| HSRP and Policy based Routing | October 26, 2005, 9:12 pm |
|
|