Point-to-Point VPN HW Vendor Suggestion?

Point-to-Point VPN HW Vendor Suggestion?
NewsGroups | Search | Tools
User Password
Register Now! Lost Password?
 comp.dcom.vpn  Post an article  get this group's latest topics as an RSS feed add this group's latest topics to your My MSN content add this group's latest topics to your My Yahoo content  add this group's latest topics to your Google content  YahooMyWeb Yahoo!  Google Google  Windows Live Favorites Windows Live  del.icio.us del.icio.us  digg digg  Add to Netscape Netscape
Subject Author Date
Point-to-Point VPN HW Vendor Suggestion? Marpilli 01-20-2006
Posted by Marpilli on January 20, 2006, 10:37 am
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
I'm looking for equipment recommendations to setup a point-to-point
hardware VPN between two locations.

Both locations are broadband. The 'A' Side has a static IP. ALL traffic
from site 'B' will be pushed through the tunnel to side 'A'.

I've been looking at purchasing a couple of Netgear FVSxxx models or D-Link
DI-80xHV models.

Any thoughts on either vendor? Does Linksys or any other have a simple
cost-effective solution?

Thank you,
Marp


NMFall 20%
Posted by Robert Side on January 20, 2006, 1:58 pm
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
> I'm looking for equipment recommendations to setup a point-to-point
> hardware VPN between two locations.

> Both locations are broadband. The 'A' Side has a static IP. ALL traffic
> from site 'B' will be pushed through the tunnel to side 'A'.

> I've been looking at purchasing a couple of Netgear FVSxxx models or D-Link
> DI-80xHV models.

> Any thoughts on either vendor? Does Linksys or any other have a simple
> cost-effective solution?

> Thank you,
> Marp


I have setup and used Zywall-10, D-LINK DI-804HV and Netgear FVS328.

The Zywall-10 was the first reasonably priced VPN/Firewall appliance.
It is, in todays standard, very old, slow and difficult to configure. However,
it does have the best firewall I've seen in the low priced VPN/Firewall
appliances.

Initially we where connecting to the Zywall using FreeSWAN, SSH sentinal,
and Windows XP VPN. All of these software packages, when connecting to
the Zywall were difficult to setup and all of them had a hard time
keeping the tunnel up.

We have now moved on to the D-LINKs and the Netgear appliances. The D-LINK
was very easy to setup and connect to the Zywall. It keeps the tunnel
up OK. I didn't spend too much time in the firewall portion but it seemed
to be about the same as most residential FW appliances.

The Netgear is very similar to the D-Link but found it a tad more difficult
to configure. However, the Netgear is maybe a little more feature rich than
the D-LINK. I also think the Netgear FW is maybe a little better than the
D-Link but less than the Zywall. In fact, it may be that the Netgear uses
the same embedded OS as the Zywall. The nice thing about the Netgears is
I can pick them up for very cheap on Ebay.

All in all, if you want a simple VPN that is easy to set up, I would
recommend the D-LINK. If you want something more sophisticated with
better FW capabilities, look into the newer Zywalls. However, there is
nothing wrong with the Netgears.

Rob

Posted by Simon on January 21, 2006, 4:08 am
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
Robert Side wrote:
>
>>I'm looking for equipment recommendations to setup a point-to-point
>>hardware VPN between two locations.
>
>
>>Both locations are broadband. The 'A' Side has a static IP. ALL traffic
>>from site 'B' will be pushed through the tunnel to side 'A'.
>
>
>>I've been looking at purchasing a couple of Netgear FVSxxx models or D-Link
>>DI-80xHV models.
>
>
>>Any thoughts on either vendor? Does Linksys or any other have a simple
>>cost-effective solution?
>
>
>>Thank you,
>>Marp
>
>
>
> I have setup and used Zywall-10, D-LINK DI-804HV and Netgear FVS328.
>
> The Zywall-10 was the first reasonably priced VPN/Firewall appliance.
> It is, in todays standard, very old, slow and difficult to configure. However,
> it does have the best firewall I've seen in the low priced VPN/Firewall
> appliances.
>
> Initially we where connecting to the Zywall using FreeSWAN, SSH sentinal,
> and Windows XP VPN. All of these software packages, when connecting to
> the Zywall were difficult to setup and all of them had a hard time
> keeping the tunnel up.
>
> We have now moved on to the D-LINKs and the Netgear appliances. The D-LINK
> was very easy to setup and connect to the Zywall. It keeps the tunnel
> up OK. I didn't spend too much time in the firewall portion but it seemed
> to be about the same as most residential FW appliances.
>
> The Netgear is very similar to the D-Link but found it a tad more difficult
> to configure. However, the Netgear is maybe a little more feature rich than
> the D-LINK. I also think the Netgear FW is maybe a little better than the
> D-Link but less than the Zywall. In fact, it may be that the Netgear uses
> the same embedded OS as the Zywall. The nice thing about the Netgears is
> I can pick them up for very cheap on Ebay.
>
> All in all, if you want a simple VPN that is easy to set up, I would
> recommend the D-LINK. If you want something more sophisticated with
> better FW capabilities, look into the newer Zywalls. However, there is
> nothing wrong with the Netgears.
>
> Rob
Draytek Vigors are pretty good and some of the models do some nice stuff
with voip too
simon


other useful resources:
The Federal Communications Commission (FCC)
Telecommunications Industry Association
Electronic and Software Security Products and Services
International Telecommunication Union

Custom CGI Perl and PHP programming by 1-Script.com

Contact Us | Privacy Policy
The site map in XML format XML site map