Mitel Mail question

Mitel Mail question

NewsGroups | Search | Tools
 comp.dcom.telecom.tech  Post an article  get this group's latest topics as an RSS feed add this group's latest topics to your My MSN content add this group's latest topics to your My Yahoo content  add this group's latest topics to your Google content  YahooMyWeb Yahoo!  Google Google  Windows Live Favorites Windows Live  del.icio.us del.icio.us  digg digg  Add to Netscape Netscape
Subject Author Date
Mitel Mail question mabbuttg 05-11-2006
Posted by on May 11, 2006, 7:27 pm
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options


Hi, I've got a question re: Mitel Mail configuration. Not entirely
sure which version we're running, although the manuals we've got date
from 1997.

The problem we're having is that voicemails set up as FCOS 15: TREE
always go straight to voicemail and don't try to ring the appropriate
extension first when called from the auto-attendant. Our non-tree
voicemails (FCOS 1 or 10, for example) when set to NP receptionist
treatment 2, gives the caller "I will ring <name>" and then the
extension gets dialed. Not so with the tree voicemails - they go
straight to voicemail, nothing else, doesn't seem to matter what NP
receptionist treatment is applied or whether it's day or night service.

I've tried creating a new FCOS and testing various combinations of
features, but it seems anything I add (such as 064, and copying FCOS 10
and adding 121 - tree - to it) breaks the tree functionality and still
doesn't ring the extension.

All suggestions appreciated.

Thanks,
Glenn


Posted by IBNFSHN on May 12, 2006, 9:55 am
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options


Its been a while, but I believe the tree MB and all mailboxes in it have to
have some sort of greeting recorded. Even if you just say "Please hold".



> Hi, I've got a question re: Mitel Mail configuration. Not entirely
> sure which version we're running, although the manuals we've got date
> from 1997.
>
> The problem we're having is that voicemails set up as FCOS 15: TREE
> always go straight to voicemail and don't try to ring the appropriate
> extension first when called from the auto-attendant. Our non-tree
> voicemails (FCOS 1 or 10, for example) when set to NP receptionist
> treatment 2, gives the caller "I will ring <name>" and then the
> extension gets dialed. Not so with the tree voicemails - they go
> straight to voicemail, nothing else, doesn't seem to matter what NP
> receptionist treatment is applied or whether it's day or night service.
>
> I've tried creating a new FCOS and testing various combinations of
> features, but it seems anything I add (such as 064, and copying FCOS 10
> and adding 121 - tree - to it) breaks the tree functionality and still
> doesn't ring the extension.
>
> All suggestions appreciated.
>
> Thanks,
> Glenn
>



Similar ThreadsPosted
Voice Mail question on Avaya Partner April 25, 2006, 1:14 pm
TVA-50 Voicemail question (concerning LAN card e-mail capabilities) September 16, 2008, 5:52 pm
Voice Mail Service that works like e-mail server? August 19, 2005, 5:25 pm
AT&T Voice mail system August 7, 2005, 2:26 am
Voice Mail Recording December 7, 2005, 6:16 pm
Norstar NAM voice mail May 14, 2006, 8:03 pm
I need help with automated assistant on partner vs mail 4.0 April 7, 2006, 6:13 pm
lucent partner plus R4.1 with vs mail 4.0 I'm at my witt's end..Please help me April 8, 2006, 6:51 pm
Partner Mail VS master login May 3, 2006, 7:34 pm
Lucent Partner Voice Mail August 28, 2006, 7:45 pm

other useful resources:
The Federal Communications Commission (FCC)
Telecommunications Industry Association
Electronic and Software Security Products and Services
International Telecommunication Union

Custom CGI Perl and PHP programming by 1-Script.com

Contact Us | Privacy Policy
The site map in XML format XML site map