May I use a Linksys WRT54G router as secondary wireless access point?

May I use a Linksys WRT54G router as secondary wireless access point?

NewsGroups | Search | Tools
 comp.dcom.lans.ethernet  Post an article  get this group's latest topics as an RSS feed add this group's latest topics to your My MSN content add this group's latest topics to your My Yahoo content  add this group's latest topics to your Google content  YahooMyWeb Yahoo!  Google Google  Windows Live Favorites Windows Live  del.icio.us del.icio.us  digg digg  Add to Netscape Netscape
Subject Author Date
May I use a Linksys WRT54G router as secondary wireless access point? Charles Wahl 01-25-2006
Posted by Charles Wahl on January 25, 2006, 10:28 pm
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options


I have a DSL home ethernet LAN using one Linksys WRT54G router with
wireless features turned on, but the signal at the far end of the
apartment is dodgy for laptop use. I don't want to relocate the main
router, but have the opportunity to get a second WRT54G cheap. Can I
configure a second one as a slave (access point), and have wireless
connection served by either one of the devices? The two routers would not
communicate wirelessly, but by CAT5.

I realize that I need to turn off the DHCP server function on the "slave,"
is there anything else I need to do? Should each router be set to use a
different wireless channel, or the same one?

I assume that it would be okay to connect more devices/computers to the
second "slave" router via CAT5 as well; is that true?

Thanks very much,
--
Charles Wahl
<remove uppercase letters in email address>

Posted by glen herrmannsfeldt on January 25, 2006, 11:25 pm


Charles Wahl wrote:

> I have a DSL home ethernet LAN using one Linksys WRT54G router with
> wireless features turned on, but the signal at the far end of the
> apartment is dodgy for laptop use. I don't want to relocate the main
> router, but have the opportunity to get a second WRT54G cheap. Can I
> configure a second one as a slave (access point), and have wireless
> connection served by either one of the devices? The two routers would not
> communicate wirelessly, but by CAT5.

That sounds fine to me.

> I realize that I need to turn off the DHCP server function on the "slave,"
> is there anything else I need to do? Should each router be set to use a
> different wireless channel, or the same one?

Why not use DHCP on the second? It does need to be a different
(sub)net, though. I would probably static address the WAN port of
the second, but it could even be done through DHCP.

> I assume that it would be okay to connect more devices/computers to the
> second "slave" router via CAT5 as well; is that true?

Yes, that should work fine.

By the way, these are more TCP/IP question and not ethernet
questions so should probably go to comp.protocols.tcp-ip

-- glen


Similar ThreadsPosted
Difference between bridge and wireless access point?? October 9, 2007, 6:57 pm
MAC addresses in router vs Access Point May 1, 2008, 5:19 am
Windows PC As IEEE 802.11 Access Point June 25, 2008, 4:43 pm
Connect 2 router linksys together February 14, 2005, 8:51 pm
can not access my web server by my WAN IP by router RP614 January 27, 2006, 12:23 am
Looking for wireless router tutorial May 2, 2005, 6:08 pm
VOIP/Wireless router/FWT/FWP December 1, 2007, 2:42 am
Connect ethernet devices to an existing wireless router network September 2, 2005, 10:12 pm
ethernet point to point wiring October 28, 2005, 1:30 pm
Want direct dialup access to my LAN June 8, 2008, 4:16 pm

other useful resources:
The Federal Communications Commission (FCC)
Telecommunications Industry Association
Electronic and Software Security Products and Services
International Telecommunication Union

Custom CGI Perl and PHP programming by 1-Script.com

Contact Us | Privacy Policy
The site map in XML format XML site map