|
Posted by Scott Townsend on May 7, 2008, 1:04 pm
If you were Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
I have 2 Mailservers,
Can I map 2 External IPs to the same Internal IP?
static (inside-HBG,outside-HBG) 192.168.1.8 10.1.0.9 netmask 255.255.255.255
static (inside-HBG,outside-HBG) 192.168.1.9 10.1.0.9 netmask 255.255.255.255
|
  | |
Posted by News Reader on May 7, 2008, 1:39 pm
If you were Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
Scott Townsend wrote:
> I have 2 Mailservers,
> Can I map 2 External IPs to the same Internal IP?
>
>
> static (inside-HBG,outside-HBG) 192.168.1.8 10.1.0.9 netmask 255.255.255.255
> static (inside-HBG,outside-HBG) 192.168.1.9 10.1.0.9 netmask 255.255.255.255
>
Seems logical to me.
The NAT translations will remain unique due to the external host's IP
address/source port combination, and the specific global NAT IP address
destination.
Best Regards,
News Reader
|
|
Posted by Scott Townsend on May 7, 2008, 2:17 pm
If you were Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
> Scott Townsend wrote:
>> I have 2 Mailservers,
>> Can I map 2 External IPs to the same Internal IP?
>>
>>
>> static (inside-HBG,outside-HBG) 192.168.1.8 10.1.0.9 netmask
>> 255.255.255.255
>> static (inside-HBG,outside-HBG) 192.168.1.9 10.1.0.9 netmask
>> 255.255.255.255
>>
>
> Seems logical to me.
>
> The NAT translations will remain unique due to the external host's IP
> address/source port combination, and the specific global NAT IP address
> destination.
>
> Best Regards,
> News Reader
|
|
Posted by Morph on May 7, 2008, 2:05 pm
If you were Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
| I have 2 Mailservers,
| Can I map 2 External IPs to the same Internal IP?
|
|
| static (inside-HBG,outside-HBG) 192.168.1.8 10.1.0.9 netmask 255.255.255.255
| static (inside-HBG,outside-HBG) 192.168.1.9 10.1.0.9 netmask 255.255.255.255
Have a look at this:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps6120/products_configuration_example09186a00807d2874.shtml
|
|
Posted by Scott Townsend on May 7, 2008, 2:21 pm
If you were Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
Expose the Private Address to the outside, I guess it would work if the 2nd
static statement was
172.16.171.126
Hmmm.. I think I might way for the DNS entry to time out on the remote
server... (-;
Thanks,
> Townsend wrote:
>
> | I have 2 Mailservers,
> | Can I map 2 External IPs to the same Internal IP?
> |
> |
> | static (inside-HBG,outside-HBG) 192.168.1.8 10.1.0.9 netmask
> 255.255.255.255
> | static (inside-HBG,outside-HBG) 192.168.1.9 10.1.0.9 netmask
> 255.255.255.255
>
> Have a look at this:
>
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps6120/products_configuration_example09186a00807d2874.shtml
|
| Similar Threads | Posted | | NAT/PAT cannot route from internal | March 13, 2008, 1:27 pm |
| VPN terminating on 1841 but cannot route to internal LAN? | June 14, 2006, 5:14 pm |
| Is this PIX Dead ? | September 12, 2005, 11:18 pm |
| Is my Cisco 837 dead??? | August 24, 2004, 12:11 am |
| ASA 7.2 - Dead Connection Detection (DCD) | September 25, 2006, 2:58 pm |
| Dead Adtran Router? | March 20, 2007, 11:46 am |
| My Cisco Catalyst 3500 XL Switch is Dead ?!! | September 5, 2007, 2:45 pm |
| Cisco 350 Wlan card - dead following firmware upgrade - suggestions? | February 1, 2006, 7:03 am |
| [OT] searching software to resurrect a dead Olicom Crossfire OC-9100 | September 25, 2008, 11:12 am |
| What is the default precedence: local-route, static-route, OSPF-route? | August 4, 2008, 3:00 am |
|
|
Yahoo! 
Google 
Windows Live 
del.icio.us 
digg 
Netscape 
XML site map