Mailserver Dead, Route IP on PIX to another Internal?

Mailserver Dead, Route IP on PIX to another Internal?

NewsGroups | Search | Tools
 comp.dcom.sys.cisco  Post an article  get this group's latest topics as an RSS feed add this group's latest topics to your My MSN content add this group's latest topics to your My Yahoo content  add this group's latest topics to your Google content  YahooMyWeb Yahoo!  Google Google  Windows Live Favorites Windows Live  del.icio.us del.icio.us  digg digg  Add to Netscape Netscape
Subject Author Date
Mailserver Dead, Route IP on PIX to another Internal? Scott Townsend 05-07-2008
Posted by Scott Townsend on May 7, 2008, 1:04 pm
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
I have 2 Mailservers,
Can I map 2 External IPs to the same Internal IP?


static (inside-HBG,outside-HBG) 192.168.1.8 10.1.0.9 netmask 255.255.255.255
static (inside-HBG,outside-HBG) 192.168.1.9 10.1.0.9 netmask 255.255.255.255


home networking made easy, greater protection, less stress, introducing nm 5.0, 728x90
Posted by News Reader on May 7, 2008, 1:39 pm
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
Scott Townsend wrote:
> I have 2 Mailservers,
> Can I map 2 External IPs to the same Internal IP?
>
>
> static (inside-HBG,outside-HBG) 192.168.1.8 10.1.0.9 netmask 255.255.255.255
> static (inside-HBG,outside-HBG) 192.168.1.9 10.1.0.9 netmask 255.255.255.255
>

Seems logical to me.

The NAT translations will remain unique due to the external host's IP
address/source port combination, and the specific global NAT IP address
destination.

Best Regards,
News Reader

Posted by Scott Townsend on May 7, 2008, 2:17 pm
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
It says that the Inside IP address is already in use. )-:


> Scott Townsend wrote:
>> I have 2 Mailservers,
>> Can I map 2 External IPs to the same Internal IP?
>>
>>
>> static (inside-HBG,outside-HBG) 192.168.1.8 10.1.0.9 netmask
>> 255.255.255.255
>> static (inside-HBG,outside-HBG) 192.168.1.9 10.1.0.9 netmask
>> 255.255.255.255
>>
>
> Seems logical to me.
>
> The NAT translations will remain unique due to the external host's IP
> address/source port combination, and the specific global NAT IP address
> destination.
>
> Best Regards,
> News Reader


Posted by Morph on May 7, 2008, 2:05 pm
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
Townsend wrote:

| I have 2 Mailservers,
| Can I map 2 External IPs to the same Internal IP?
|
|
| static (inside-HBG,outside-HBG) 192.168.1.8 10.1.0.9 netmask 255.255.255.255
| static (inside-HBG,outside-HBG) 192.168.1.9 10.1.0.9 netmask 255.255.255.255

Have a look at this:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps6120/products_configuration_example09186a00807d2874.shtml

Posted by Scott Townsend on May 7, 2008, 2:21 pm
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
Hmmm.. I think I follow it, though not sure how/why you would need to
Expose the Private Address to the outside, I guess it would work if the 2nd
static statement was
172.16.171.126

Hmmm.. I think I might way for the DNS entry to time out on the remote
server... (-;

Thanks,




> Townsend wrote:
>
> | I have 2 Mailservers,
> | Can I map 2 External IPs to the same Internal IP?
> |
> |
> | static (inside-HBG,outside-HBG) 192.168.1.8 10.1.0.9 netmask
> 255.255.255.255
> | static (inside-HBG,outside-HBG) 192.168.1.9 10.1.0.9 netmask
> 255.255.255.255
>
> Have a look at this:
>
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps6120/products_configuration_example09186a00807d2874.shtml


Similar ThreadsPosted
NAT/PAT cannot route from internal March 13, 2008, 1:27 pm
VPN terminating on 1841 but cannot route to internal LAN? June 14, 2006, 5:14 pm
Is this PIX Dead ? September 12, 2005, 11:18 pm
Is my Cisco 837 dead??? August 24, 2004, 12:11 am
ASA 7.2 - Dead Connection Detection (DCD) September 25, 2006, 2:58 pm
Dead Adtran Router? March 20, 2007, 11:46 am
My Cisco Catalyst 3500 XL Switch is Dead ?!! September 5, 2007, 2:45 pm
Cisco 350 Wlan card - dead following firmware upgrade - suggestions? February 1, 2006, 7:03 am
[OT] searching software to resurrect a dead Olicom Crossfire OC-9100 September 25, 2008, 11:12 am
What is the default precedence: local-route, static-route, OSPF-route? August 4, 2008, 3:00 am

other useful resources:
The Federal Communications Commission (FCC)
Telecommunications Industry Association
Electronic and Software Security Products and Services
International Telecommunication Union

Custom CGI Perl and PHP programming by 1-Script.com

Contact Us | Privacy Policy
The site map in XML format XML site map