MPLS vs VLAN and 802.1q tags for QOS

MPLS vs VLAN and 802.1q tags for QOS

NewsGroups | Search | Tools
 comp.dcom.lans.ethernet  Post an article  get this group's latest topics as an RSS feed add this group's latest topics to your My MSN content add this group's latest topics to your My Yahoo content  add this group's latest topics to your Google content  YahooMyWeb Yahoo!  Google Google  Windows Live Favorites Windows Live  del.icio.us del.icio.us  digg digg  Add to Netscape Netscape
Subject Author Date
MPLS vs VLAN and 802.1q tags for QOS NewToDataNetworks 08-28-2006
Posted by NewToDataNetworks on August 28, 2006, 1:13 pm
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options


I am trying to understand why the current access networks are going
towards ethernet based systems. We already have MPLS on the core
network side. Now we have ethernet on the access side.

We use VLAN and 802.1q tags for QOS in the ethernet. Why cant we have
MPLS everywhere and dont have to worry anything else. MPLS already does
the QOS for us.

thanks.


Spring Sale Save 20% Banner - Sale Ended 5/3/07 So Updated to NonPromo Ad
Posted by Albert Manfredi on August 28, 2006, 3:38 pm
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options



>I am trying to understand why the current access networks are going
> towards ethernet based systems. We already have MPLS on the core
> network side. Now we have ethernet on the access side.
>
> We use VLAN and 802.1q tags for QOS in the ethernet. Why cant we have
> MPLS everywhere and dont have to worry anything else. MPLS already
> does
> the QOS for us.

Because MPLS establishes paths among layer 3 boxes, routers, and not
inside a layer 2 network.

You could use MPLS in small geographic areas, in principle, but that
would mean setting up a lot of small IP subnets first. Most nets are not
set up that way, but there's no reason to think they can't be. Make
every Ethernet switch a router, for example.

As to "current access networks," they have traditionally been Ethernet
for a good many years. I mean, leaving aside the other old standby,
which was modem over a POTS line.

Bert


Posted by Steinar Haug on August 31, 2006, 3:02 pm
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options


> > We use VLAN and 802.1q tags for QOS in the ethernet. Why cant we have
> > MPLS everywhere and dont have to worry anything else. MPLS already
> > does
> > the QOS for us.
>
> Because MPLS establishes paths among layer 3 boxes, routers, and not
> inside a layer 2 network.

For another take on this: I'm sure several vendors would be very happy
to sell you boxes that can do both L2 and MPLS for your whole network.
But you probably wouldn't be very happy with the price tag.

Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting, sthaug@nethelp.no

Similar ThreadsPosted
Priority Tagging and VLAN Tags March 28, 2006, 11:25 am
VLAN Help (for a Vlan newbie) November 6, 2006, 12:09 pm
port-based vlan and tag-based vlan October 21, 2008, 2:03 pm
port-based vlan and tag-based vlan October 21, 2008, 2:03 pm
VLAN December 13, 2005, 10:23 am
VLAN and VPN January 17, 2007, 1:05 pm
VPN Vs VLAN December 21, 2007, 3:54 pm
VLAN May 24, 2008, 2:08 am
mac vlan September 29, 2008, 10:14 am
VLAN and Subnet March 27, 2005, 1:31 pm

other useful resources:
The Federal Communications Commission (FCC)
Telecommunications Industry Association
Electronic and Software Security Products and Services
International Telecommunication Union

Custom CGI Perl and PHP programming by 1-Script.com

Contact Us | Privacy Policy
The site map in XML format XML site map