MAC addresses in router vs Access Point

MAC addresses in router vs Access Point

NewsGroups | Search | Tools
 comp.dcom.lans.ethernet  Post an article  get this group's latest topics as an RSS feed add this group's latest topics to your My MSN content add this group's latest topics to your My Yahoo content  add this group's latest topics to your Google content  YahooMyWeb Yahoo!  Google Google  Windows Live Favorites Windows Live  del.icio.us del.icio.us  digg digg  Add to Netscape Netscape
Subject Author Date
MAC addresses in router vs Access Point Ale 05-01-2008
Posted by Patrick Schaaf on May 2, 2008, 2:33 am
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options

>Yes, but not if it used the same MAC on both the WAN and LAN
>ports, as seems to be allowed for IP routers.

On a WAN port, a router often does not use ethernet framing at all.
In these cases no (ethernet) MAC address is used on the WAN port.

best regards
Patrick

Posted by DLR on May 3, 2008, 7:41 am
Patrick Schaaf wrote:
>
>> Yes, but not if it used the same MAC on both the WAN and LAN
>> ports, as seems to be allowed for IP routers.
>
> On a WAN port, a router often does not use ethernet framing at all.
> In these cases no (ethernet) MAC address is used on the WAN port.

Excuse me?!?!?

Posted by Steinar Haug on May 3, 2008, 8:28 am
> >> Yes, but not if it used the same MAC on both the WAN and LAN
> >> ports, as seems to be allowed for IP routers.
> > On a WAN port, a router often does not use ethernet framing at all.
> > In these cases no (ethernet) MAC address is used on the WAN port.
>
> Excuse me?!?!?

Read up on (for instance) serial links and PPP encapsulation. No MAC
address is used.

Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting, sthaug@nethelp.no

Posted by glen herrmannsfeldt on May 3, 2008, 11:30 am
Steinar Haug wrote:

>>>>Yes, but not if it used the same MAC on both the WAN and LAN
>>>>ports, as seems to be allowed for IP routers.

>>>On a WAN port, a router often does not use ethernet framing at all.
>>>In these cases no (ethernet) MAC address is used on the WAN port.

>>Excuse me?!?!?

> Read up on (for instance) serial links and PPP encapsulation. No MAC
> address is used.

But for PPPoE, as you might find in a router with wireless
access point, there would be a MAC address. I believe there
are enough home routers using ethernet that 'often' doesn't
apply to serial links anymore. (I presume you mostly mean
the serial links used for T1 connections.)

-- glen


Posted by jpd on May 3, 2008, 12:09 pm
On Sat, 03 May 2008 07:30:03 -0800,
> Steinar Haug wrote:
>>>>On a WAN port, a router often does not use ethernet framing at all.
>>>>In these cases no (ethernet) MAC address is used on the WAN port.
>
>>>Excuse me?!?!?
>
>> Read up on (for instance) serial links and PPP encapsulation. No MAC
>> address is used.
>
> But for PPPoE, as you might find in a router with wireless
> access point, there would be a MAC address.

You mean, as you use to interface something found in a home with the DSL
modem. The WAN side often ends up being ATM again, and probably doesn't
use ethernet framing. ``Probably'' because this is an educated guess and
I have not looked at what actually comes out on that side of the device.


> I believe there are enough home routers using ethernet that 'often'
> doesn't apply to serial links anymore. (I presume you mostly mean the
> serial links used for T1 connections.)

In sheer numbers, most ``routers'' might be DSL modems fancied up
with some other functionality, but I somehow fail to think of last
mile linkups as Wide Area Networking. T1/E1 indeed don't use ethernet
framing, and neither does plain dialup, but plenty other technologies
also don't (think SONET, etc.) altough you can often enough transport
ethernet frames over those again.

The point was that ethernet MACs are not inherently required for
``networking'', and thus network ports will exist without a MAC address.
Logically, those ports will not be ethernet ports, but that doesn't mean
you can't push packets through them.


--
j p d (at) d s b (dot) t u d e l f t (dot) n l .
This message was originally posted on Usenet in plain text.
Any other representation, additions, or changes do not have my
consent and may be a violation of international copyright law.

Similar ThreadsPosted
May I use a Linksys WRT54G router as secondary wireless access point? January 25, 2006, 10:28 pm
Windows PC As IEEE 802.11 Access Point June 25, 2008, 4:43 pm
Difference between bridge and wireless access point?? October 9, 2007, 6:57 pm
can not access my web server by my WAN IP by router RP614 January 27, 2006, 12:23 am
ethernet point to point wiring October 28, 2005, 1:30 pm
Want direct dialup access to my LAN June 8, 2008, 4:16 pm
802.3ad and multiple mac addresses June 4, 2007, 2:25 pm
duplicate MAC addresses November 19, 2007, 6:02 pm
Looking for NextGeneration Ethernet Access Products developers August 3, 2005, 12:01 am
Secure telnet access - 3Com switch August 9, 2005, 11:38 am

other useful resources:
The Federal Communications Commission (FCC)
Telecommunications Industry Association
Electronic and Software Security Products and Services
International Telecommunication Union

Custom CGI Perl and PHP programming by 1-Script.com

Contact Us | Privacy Policy
The site map in XML format XML site map