Linksys GIG v's Cisco Gig

Linksys GIG v's Cisco Gig

NewsGroups | Search | Tools
 comp.dcom.sys.cisco  Post an article  get this group's latest topics as an RSS feed add this group's latest topics to your My MSN content add this group's latest topics to your My Yahoo content  add this group's latest topics to your Google content  YahooMyWeb Yahoo!  Google Google  Windows Live Favorites Windows Live  del.icio.us del.icio.us  digg digg  Add to Netscape Netscape
Subject Author Date
Linksys GIG v's Cisco Gig Gary 10-14-2006
Posted by Gary on October 14, 2006, 2:01 pm
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
I can buy a linksys GIG Switch for about $400 while the same port density on
a Cisco costs $3000

If I do not need any of the bells and whistles like VLAN's/QoS etc. can I
assume the Linksys will perform at the same speeds and performance.

As Cisco have bought em I assume they were becoming a threat in some way.

G



Network Magic Graduation 20% off animated banner
Posted by Walter Roberson on October 14, 2006, 2:18 pm
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
>I can buy a linksys GIG Switch for about $400 while the same port density on
>a Cisco costs $3000

>If I do not need any of the bells and whistles like VLAN's/QoS etc. can I
>assume the Linksys will perform at the same speeds and performance.

No, that's not a good assumption at all; it would be false for most
inexpensive gigabit switches. And unfortunately it is often quite
difficult to find independant reviews that aren't just a rewriting
of the advertising brochure.

Someone did point out an inexpensive linksys to me recently, for which
I -was- able to find a positive independant review; it was the SD2008
(a design from a couple of years ago), and the review is at
http://soltesz.net/sd2008/part3.html
It's pretty good considering the price, but it does *not* get
gigabit at minimum packet size (which is what Cisco measures),
and the latency creeps up with packet size. The SD2008 is completely
unmanaged. I found a number of reviews that says that the fan on it
is quite noisy and that it runs hot; one review said it ran quiet and
cool, so it is possible they changed the fan design along the way.


Posted by Gary on October 14, 2006, 3:44 pm
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options

> wrote:
>>I can buy a linksys GIG Switch for about $400 while the same port density
>>on
>>a Cisco costs $3000
>
>>If I do not need any of the bells and whistles like VLAN's/QoS etc. can I
>>assume the Linksys will perform at the same speeds and performance.
>
> No, that's not a good assumption at all; it would be false for most
> inexpensive gigabit switches. And unfortunately it is often quite
> difficult to find independant reviews that aren't just a rewriting
> of the advertising brochure.
>
> Someone did point out an inexpensive linksys to me recently, for which
> I -was- able to find a positive independant review; it was the SD2008
> (a design from a couple of years ago), and the review is at
> http://soltesz.net/sd2008/part3.html
> It's pretty good considering the price, but it does *not* get
> gigabit at minimum packet size (which is what Cisco measures),
> and the latency creeps up with packet size. The SD2008 is completely
> unmanaged. I found a number of reviews that says that the fan on it
> is quite noisy and that it runs hot; one review said it ran quiet and
> cool, so it is possible they changed the fan design along the way.
>

Trying to find reviews of the SR2024 and tech sheet but there is precious
little. Blurb says:
The 24-Port 10/100/1000 Gigabit Switch provides non-blocking, wire speed
switching

Price comarison is $400 v's $Loads for anything Gig from Cisco.

Gary



Posted by Walter Roberson on October 14, 2006, 9:04 pm
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options

>Trying to find reviews of the SR2024 and tech sheet but there is precious
>little. Blurb says:
>The 24-Port 10/100/1000 Gigabit Switch provides non-blocking, wire speed
>switching

Consider the SRW2024 instead -- at least you'll get WebView so
you can do some remote configuration.

The SR2024 and SRW2024 both review as having a loud fan.

Real information... hard to find. There's some nuggets here,
http://www.newegg.com/Product/CustratingReview.asp?item=N82E16833124049


I found a mid-sized thread from someone using the SRW's who couldn't
get more than 300 Mbit/s throughput; no-one was able to come up
with anything that helped his particular situation (whatever the
actual cause was.) There was a useful resource in there,

http://www.enterprisenetworkingplanet.com/nethub/article.php/3485486
"Squeeze Your Gigabit NIC for Top Performance"


I skimmed over lots of other links, but the rest was just fluff or
ads or people asking whether anyone knew anything about them...

Similar ThreadsPosted
Cisco Pix 501 and Linksys router July 6, 2005, 4:34 pm
telnet through Linksys to Cisco April 11, 2006, 4:56 pm
cisco 7960 POE on linksys SRW 244 P August 2, 2006, 9:30 am
Linksys with cisco switch March 5, 2007, 1:57 am
Linksys SFE2000P - not really a Cisco July 4, 2008, 5:44 pm
Cisco owned (linksys wet11b) is cisco failing to see market demands? March 10, 2005, 10:02 pm
Cisco 1720 and Linksys RV042 August 17, 2004, 6:01 pm
Cisco 837 IPSEC Linksys WAG54g July 11, 2005, 4:37 pm
Linksys BEFVP41 to Cisco Pix 506E July 21, 2005, 7:50 am
Linksys Router < -- > Cisco PIX 506e September 22, 2005, 9:02 am

other useful resources:
The Federal Communications Commission (FCC)
Telecommunications Industry Association
Electronic and Software Security Products and Services
International Telecommunication Union

Custom CGI Perl and PHP programming by 1-Script.com

Contact Us | Privacy Policy
The site map in XML format XML site map