|
Posted by TZ on November 15, 2006, 12:16 pm
If you were Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options John, Good thinking. Yes, trouble follows the Rev.3 card.
John 807 wrote:
> To determine whether it is hardware or programming, are you able to roll th
> cards and see if the trouble follows the card?
>
> John 807
> > Dear Nortel PBX Techs,
> >
> > We have a software IVR application that has been compatible with
> > Meridian Option 81 & Option 11 for years and uses a T1 interface for
> > the voice connection. For the past few years we have generally used a
> > NT5D11AE model T1 card programmed with 500 Stations for each channel in
> > a simple OPX-style interface. The circuit card is configured with
> > jumpers to use D4 framing, AMI line coding and loop start protocol. We
> > became very familiar with the robbed-bit signalling the switch would
> > provide to indicate call arrival, seizure, and diconnect and configured
> > our software to recognize these successfully.
> >
> > I anticiapte some changes have occurred recently in either the model of
> > T1 card or firmware for it which Nortel currently releases to site.
> > Could someone please provide any resources I could investigate to help
> > determine if changes occurred, specifcally in relation to how a
> > loopstart digital circuit would be administered?
> >
> > It could be that we have just run into a rash of people who are not
> > familiar with conguring the Nortel exactly how we need it to be, but
> > from what I can tell -- they have configured things correctly.
> >
> > We are able to establish the actual DS1 link no problem, so I am
> > confident the basic pinout, framing, and line coding have been attended
> > to properly.
> >
> > Our primary difficulty currently is that te switch is able to deliver a
> > ringing call to a port, and our application sees the signal and
> > answers. Everything goes according to plan, although we seem to lack
> > the expected bit change (a-1) when the call disconnects.
> >
> > To the best of our ability we have narrowed this down to Rev.2 of the
> > above board works whereas Rev. 3 does not.
> >
> > Any thoughts would be appreciated. Thank you!
> >
> >
> > Tony
> >
|