Intel Video Phone

Intel Video Phone

NewsGroups | Search | Tools
 comp.dcom.videoconf  Post an article  get this group's latest topics as an RSS feed add this group's latest topics to your My MSN content add this group's latest topics to your My Yahoo content  add this group's latest topics to your Google content  YahooMyWeb Yahoo!  Google Google  Windows Live Favorites Windows Live  del.icio.us del.icio.us  digg digg  Add to Netscape Netscape
Subject Author Date
Intel Video Phone dbiles 01-02-2006
Posted by dbiles on January 2, 2006, 5:39 pm
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
I've seen this all over the net, but I can't figure out how to implement
these settings on my Linksys router's port triggering feature. Anybody
wanna lend a hand?

Thanks DB

---------------------------------------------

H.323 compliant video player,
NetMeeting 2.0, 3.0, Intel Video Phone
(Watch Out! Opens a wide port range!)
(Incoming calls are not possible
due to NetMeeting assigning ports dynamically.)
OUT TCP 1720
IN UDP 1024 65534 [use H.323 protocol if available]
OUT UDP 1024 65534 [use H.323 protocol if available]
IN TCP 1024 1502 [use H.323 protocol if available]
OUT TCP 1024 1502 [use H.323 protocol if available]
IN TCP 1504 1730 [use H.323 protocol if available]
OUT TCP 1504 1730 [use H.323 protocol if available]
IN TCP 1732 65534 [use H.323 protocol if available]
OUT TCP 1732 65534 [use H.323 protocol if available]
OUT TCP 1503 1503
OUT TCP 1731 1731
IN TCP 1503 1503
IN TCP 1731 1731

----------------------------------------------



NMFall 20%
Posted by NetSteady on January 3, 2006, 8:11 am
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
Personally, I never rely on port triggering. I'd put your videophone in
the DMZ instead, if you dont mind it being on the public internet.

Your other option, with a higher security measure, is to use a NAT
Traversal solution.

Chris


Posted by dbiles on January 3, 2006, 8:38 pm
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
well, I do mind the exposure of the DMZ. I'd like to use the port trigger
method, if you know how, could you please enlighten me?


Thanks DB
> Personally, I never rely on port triggering. I'd put your videophone in
> the DMZ instead, if you dont mind it being on the public internet.
>
> Your other option, with a higher security measure, is to use a NAT
> Traversal solution.
>
> Chris
>



Posted by Don B. on February 2, 2006, 3:26 am
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
http://www.portforward.com/

Lots of good info here.


> well, I do mind the exposure of the DMZ. I'd like to use the port trigger
> method, if you know how, could you please enlighten me?
>
>
> Thanks DB
>> Personally, I never rely on port triggering. I'd put your videophone in
>> the DMZ instead, if you dont mind it being on the public internet.
>>
>> Your other option, with a higher security measure, is to use a NAT
>> Traversal solution.
>>
>> Chris
>>
>
>



Similar ThreadsPosted
JOB: Video Engineer Lead- (Video Compression Algorithm, H.264) - Austin, TX April 26, 2005, 5:26 pm
video conference with dfl-700 February 26, 2005, 2:04 am
Help me about Video conference March 1, 2005, 8:25 pm
Video Conferencing comes of Age June 8, 2005, 5:57 pm
Video Chat July 7, 2005, 11:20 am
Video Teleconferencing September 21, 2006, 12:05 am
New To Video Conferencing December 20, 2006, 10:28 am
Video teleconferencing equipments March 27, 2005, 5:11 pm
Re: re:video conference software ~ July 7, 2005, 11:20 am
video teleconferencing equipment August 30, 2005, 6:27 pm

other useful resources:
The Federal Communications Commission (FCC)
Telecommunications Industry Association
Electronic and Software Security Products and Services
International Telecommunication Union

Custom CGI Perl and PHP programming by 1-Script.com

Contact Us | Privacy Policy
The site map in XML format XML site map