Help: H.248/MGCP protocol vs SIP for SS7 interworking

Help: H.248/MGCP protocol vs SIP for SS7 interworking

NewsGroups | Search | Tools
 comp.dcom.voice-over-ip  Post an article  get this group's latest topics as an RSS feed add this group's latest topics to your My MSN content add this group's latest topics to your My Yahoo content  add this group's latest topics to your Google content  YahooMyWeb Yahoo!  Google Google  Windows Live Favorites Windows Live  del.icio.us del.icio.us  digg digg  Add to Netscape Netscape
Subject Author Date
Help: H.248/MGCP protocol vs SIP for SS7 interworking jmiklo 05-10-2006
Posted by jmiklo on May 10, 2006, 7:33 pm
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
Hi,
I am trying to explain something to myself so I'd appreciate someone shed
some light on this ...
Suppose we have softswitch (SS) with media gateway (MG) and signalling
gateway (SG). I.e call is coming from PSTN and ISUP IAM message is coming
via signalling link to SG.
Inside that ISUP message there is CIC (Circuit Identification Code) saying
which channel will be used on specific E1 link for voice/media. If
signalling gateway has M3UA implemented, ISUP message is extracted and sent
to SS (MGC - Media Gateway Controller).
Now MGC needs to control/activate that specific channel inside E1 links on
media gateway. Af far as I can see only master/slave voip protocols like
MGCP/H.248 can implement this, i.e. control specific channel on specific
port (i.e. channel 21 on second E1). It couldn't be done via SIP ? Or it
could ?
My point is, if everything is goind sip way, why is MGCP/Megaco still
heavily used for controlling media gateways (when interconnecting with SS7
networks).

thanks,
jmiklo



Spring Sale Save 20% Banner - Sale Ended 5/3/07 So Updated to NonPromo Ad
Posted by on May 16, 2006, 6:10 am
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
SIP is for VoIP - for VoIP calls it is still a necessity to have an
interface between that and the PSTN systems. This is where MGCP comes
in. Ultimately I would say it is a vendor decision to incorporate some
form of gateway interface into their system or not. I believe NuEra's
soft switch system has the ability to breakout into the PSTN network,
and the obvious big players have incorporated this functionality
(Ericsson Cisco (CCM V5 for SIp) etc) but other pure SIP systems cannot
and rely on others for their breakout capability.

It is a good point and something I had previously been ignorant of!
Typical you work with this stuff all the time and ignore the obvious
things.


Similar ThreadsPosted
SIP to V5.2 Interworking Gateway December 21, 2005, 2:01 pm
RTP protocol use April 29, 2007, 7:28 am
Remote phone control protocol for SIP phones December 18, 2007, 12:25 pm

other useful resources:
The Federal Communications Commission (FCC)
Telecommunications Industry Association
Electronic and Software Security Products and Services
International Telecommunication Union

Custom CGI Perl and PHP programming by 1-Script.com

Contact Us | Privacy Policy
The site map in XML format XML site map