FCC Approval for Automatic Transfer Switch

NewsGroups | Search | Tools

User Password

Lost Password?

comp.dcom.telecom.tech

get this group's latest topics as an RSS feed

add this group's latest topics to your My MSN content

add this group's latest topics to your My Yahoo content

add this group's latest topics to your Google content

Yahoo!

Google

Windows Live

del.icio.us digg

digg

Netscape

Subject

Author

Date

FCC Approval for Automatic Transfer Switch

bbawkon

05-23-2007

Re: FCC Approval for Automatic Transfer Switch

Terry

05-23-2007

Re: FCC Approval for Automatic Transfer Switch

bbawkon

05-23-2007

Re: FCC Approval for Automatic Transfer Switch

Terry

05-24-2007

Re: FCC Approval for Automatic Transfer Switch

Al Gillis

05-24-2007

Re: FCC Approval for Automatic Transfer Switch

Robert Bonomi

05-26-2007

Posted by on May 23, 2007, 8:40 pm

If you were Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options

Hello Everyone,

I've searched and searched, but I just can't seem to come up with a
solid answer. I've asked quite a few people that I consider
knowledgeable about FCC Part 68, but I've got some VERY mixed answers
to my question. I'm hoping someone here can at least point me in the
right direction - even if you can't clear up the murky waters.

We're designing an automatic PSTN Failover device. It's basically a
DPDT relay connected to a micro-controller. The micro-controller is
connected to a PBX, and if the PBX Fails, the uC switches the relay so
that a different PBX can take over the line. This is a BIT
simplified, but the relays (I believe) are the only important part of
the equation anyway.

What we need to know, is what FCC rules will govern our device? Does
it even have to be FCC approved since it doesn't have any electrical
circuits in the PSTN line?

Any help, or pointers to FCC rules would be HIGHLY appreciated.

Thanks for your time,
Ben

home networking made easy, greater protection, less stress, introducing nm 5.0, 728x90

Posted by Terry on May 23, 2007, 10:42 pm

If you were Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options

> Hello Everyone,

> I've searched and searched, but I just can't seem to come up with a

> solid answer. I've asked quite a few people that I consider

> knowledgeable about FCC Part 68, but I've got some VERY mixed answers

> to my question. I'm hoping someone here can at least point me in the

> right direction - even if you can't clear up the murky waters.

> We're designing an automatic PSTN Failover device. It's basically a

> DPDT relay connected to a micro-controller. The micro-controller is

> connected to a PBX, and if the PBX Fails, the uC switches the relay so

> that a different PBX can take over the line. This is a BIT

> simplified, but the relays (I believe) are the only important part of

> the equation anyway.

> What we need to know, is what FCC rules will govern our device? Does

> it even have to be FCC approved since it doesn't have any electrical

> circuits in the PSTN line?

> Any help, or pointers to FCC rules would be HIGHLY appreciated.

> Thanks for your time,

> Ben

Ah, the wheel again. Several PBXs back in theMitel SX days had power failure
boxes that do exactly what you want, and must have been certified. Somebody
must still make them. have you looked at the Viking PF-6A ?

TerryS

Posted by on May 23, 2007, 11:32 pm

If you were Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options

> > Hello Everyone,

> > I've searched and searched, but I just can't seem to come up with a

> > solid answer. I've asked quite a few people that I consider

> > knowledgeable about FCC Part 68, but I've got some VERY mixed answers

> > to my question. I'm hoping someone here can at least point me in the

> > right direction - even if you can't clear up the murky waters.

> > We're designing an automatic PSTN Failover device. It's basically a

> > DPDT relay connected to a micro-controller. The micro-controller is

> > connected to a PBX, and if the PBX Fails, the uC switches the relay so

> > that a different PBX can take over the line. This is a BIT

> > simplified, but the relays (I believe) are the only important part of

> > the equation anyway.

> > What we need to know, is what FCC rules will govern our device? Does

> > it even have to be FCC approved since it doesn't have any electrical

> > circuits in the PSTN line?

> > Any help, or pointers to FCC rules would be HIGHLY appreciated.

> > Thanks for your time,

> > Ben

> Ah, the wheel again. Several PBXs back in theMitel SX days had power failure

> boxes that do exactly what you want, and must have been certified. Somebody

> must still make them. have you looked at the Viking PF-6A ?

> TerryS- Hide quoted text -

> - Show quoted text -

Thanks for your reply TerryS,

I actually did look at the Viking PF-6A for ideas - good thought.
Unfortunately, from what I can tell anyway, this device is a bit
different than ours.
A) It CONVERTS lines from loop start to ground start - meaning that it
IS the endpoint
B) It monitors the line for use, and only switches during NON-USE -
again, meaning that it does have SOME actual electronics in the path.

Thanks again TerryS - if you see this differently than I do, please
comment. I aprreciate your time to reply!

Ben

Posted by Terry on May 24, 2007, 7:37 am

If you were Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options

>> > Hello Everyone,

>> > I've searched and searched, but I just can't seem to come up with a

>> > solid answer. I've asked quite a few people that I consider

>> > knowledgeable about FCC Part 68, but I've got some VERY mixed answers

>> > to my question. I'm hoping someone here can at least point me in the

>> > right direction - even if you can't clear up the murky waters.

>> > We're designing an automatic PSTN Failover device. It's basically a

>> > DPDT relay connected to a micro-controller. The micro-controller is

>> > connected to a PBX, and if the PBX Fails, the uC switches the relay so

>> > that a different PBX can take over the line. This is a BIT

>> > simplified, but the relays (I believe) are the only important part of

>> > the equation anyway.

>> > What we need to know, is what FCC rules will govern our device? Does

>> > it even have to be FCC approved since it doesn't have any electrical

>> > circuits in the PSTN line?

>> > Any help, or pointers to FCC rules would be HIGHLY appreciated.

>> > Thanks for your time,

>> > Ben

>> Ah, the wheel again. Several PBXs back in theMitel SX days had power

>> failure

>> boxes that do exactly what you want, and must have been certified.

>> Somebody

>> must still make them. have you looked at the Viking PF-6A ?

>> TerryS- Hide quoted text -

>> - Show quoted text -

> Thanks for your reply TerryS,

> I actually did look at the Viking PF-6A for ideas - good thought.

> Unfortunately, from what I can tell anyway, this device is a bit

> different than ours.

> A) It CONVERTS lines from loop start to ground start - meaning that it

> IS the endpoint

> B) It monitors the line for use, and only switches during NON-USE -

> again, meaning that it does have SOME actual electronics in the path.

> Thanks again TerryS - if you see this differently than I do, please

> comment. I aprreciate your time to reply!

> Ben

The PF-6A can be programmed to not convert and is switchable upon command.
The not switching back until line is idle, if a problem, may be disabled on
order by Viking ? Cheaper than inventing one. How about

http://www.gkinc.com/PDFFiles/BPds_1.pdf

IIRC, there are OEM modules that are Part68 compliant on one side, and you
can do anything you want on the other. I believe I have seen them not to
long ago in a catalog from a large electronic parts distributor. Also in one
of those toy electronic kits that you assemble, the one for making funny
noises on the telephone line had a pre assembled interface.

A really expensive idea is to get a faxswitch "Stick" for each line, do not
apply power, and manipulate your lines at the default output. It passively
complies with Part 68.

TerryS

Posted by Al Gillis on May 24, 2007, 12:13 pm

If you were Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options

Hi Ben -
You didn't exactly say if you've looked through FCC regulations, Part 68,
which apply to "Connection of Terminal Equipment to the Telephone Network".
Numerous other documents are referenced by Part 68 and that's where you'll
probably find the real answers for your questions. Here's a link to get you
started:
http://www.access.gpo.gov/nara/cfr/waisidx_06/47cfr68_06.html

Good luck, pal... You're getting mixed up with the government now!