|
Posted by Franc Zabkar on October 21, 2006, 7:19 pm
If you were Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
>> The problem with John Navas is that he is arrogant, abrasive,
>> and dismissive of other people's opinions.
>
>So? Beggars cannot be choosers. Why would you look for
>validation from him or anyone else? It can only come from within.
There is no excuse for arrogance and rudeness.
>> That's not to say that his FAQ is not an excellent resource.
>
>Precisely. Glass half-empty or half full? Take the best of
>what people offer, and do not complain of that which you do
>not want. It smacks of ingratitude or worse.
Should a beggar be grateful if a passerby gives him a penny and a
sneer?
>> But as for his motivation, I think a large part
>> of it is self aggrandisement.
>
>Sp? Are you a qualified mental health professional? And if
>perchance you were, you'd know you cannot diagnose on such
>thin data. What would it matter anyways? Will you only deal
>with those whose motive you judge "pure"?
>
>-- Robert
The data are plentiful. Google's Usenet archives are full of examples.
I myself have experienced his pomposity on many occasions. In fact he
even treats his own brother with disdain. In any case the evidence is
there is his own FAQ, as I have clearly pointed out in my previous
post.
- Franc Zabkar
--
Please remove one 'i' from my address when replying by email.
| 
NewsGroups 
Yahoo! 
Google 
Windows Live 
del.icio.us 
digg 
Netscape 
XML site map