|
Posted by zaj on October 20, 2006, 9:36 pm
If you were Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
Timothy Daniels wrote:
> "Warren" wrote:
>> So because some people disagree with him, nothing he says is of any
>> value?
>
>
> Did I say that?
Yep, in more words than that...
>
>
>> I'm sure I can dig-up a few things you've said that others have
>> believed they sufficiently proven you wrong about that you continued
>> to maintain your own opinion.
>>
>> Do I agree with everything John says? No. I don't remember anything
>> specific, but I'm pretty sure you'll find something he and I disagreed
>> on sometime in the last decade, and I'm sure you could also dig up
>> people who agreed with him, as well as people who agreed with me.
>>
>> But that doesn't invalidate the value of the link he provided.
>> Spending an hour reading his guide is a better use of time than
>> spending an hour reading these Usenet groups. Again, don't agree with
>> him 100%. There's no one I agree with 100%. I don't even agree with
>> myself 100% of the time. But I feel comfortable enough saying that his
>> page is an excellent resource, and offers far better advice, and in a
>> more concise way than many other sites.
>>
>> Want to disagree with something specific John says? Go ahead. I'm sure
>> if you nit-pick enough you can find a few things. I know I can. Then
>> take the time to put together as comprehensive and concise resource as
>> he has, and then give it away for free. Then come back and tell us
>> about what a great tax deduction it is.
>>
>> BTW... John used to spend a lot of time on Usenet helping thousands
>> of strangers with their problems for free. But you can add him to a
>> growing list of people who just don't bother anymore. I can't speak
>> for why John isn't around as much anymore, but I wouldn't be surprised
>> if it was because the occasional "thank you" stopped being gratifying
>> enough to make up for all the snipers who apparently stroke their own
>> egos not by participating constructively, but by flaming those who do.
>
>
>
> So after 5 paragraphs, what's your point?
There ya go...you've proven it's a waste of time to counter your
omnipotent opinion.
>
> *TimDaniels*
|