|
Posted by T on June 20, 2008, 7:46 pm
If you were Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options dave.garland@wizinfo.com says...
> It was a dark and stormy night when hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com wrote:
>
> >As an aside, some singers wear headsets while performing and dancing.
> >I think that's ugly. When they turn around you can see the
> >transceiver mounted on the back of their outfit. I presume the
> >transmitter on those units is of much higher fidelity than a telephone
> >grade transmitter.
>
> It is. These days there's no reason why electret microphones (which are
> tiny) can't be used, and those can be very good. Singers like the
> headset mikes because they let them move around without being tethered
> to a mike (if you don't keep your mouth at exactly the same distance
> from the mike, which needs to be pretty close to exclude outside noise,
> the level keeps changing).
>
> I think most telephones these days use electret transmitters too. Of
> course, the fidelity is limited by the audio bandwidth available from
> the telco. The transmitter is usually capable of far better.
Yes in fact my DECT cordless has very sensitive microphones. So much so
that the speakerphone functionality actually works very well.
|