Contivity 1100 (VPN Router) and Demand (Backup Interface)

Contivity 1100 (VPN Router) and Demand (Backup Interface)

NewsGroups | Search | Tools
 comp.dcom.sys.nortel  Post an article  get this group's latest topics as an RSS feed add this group's latest topics to your My MSN content add this group's latest topics to your My Yahoo content  add this group's latest topics to your Google content  YahooMyWeb Yahoo!  Google Google  Windows Live Favorites Windows Live  del.icio.us del.icio.us  digg digg  Add to Netscape Netscape
Subject Author Date
Contivity 1100 (VPN Router) and Demand (Backup Interface) v_2morm 05-03-2007
Posted by on May 3, 2007, 1:53 pm
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
Hi everyone,

We are currently migrating all of our remote store sites to Nortel
Contivity 1100 routers (called 1100 VPN routers now I believe).

At our head office and DRP site we have 1750's, which the 1100's will
be connecting to via branch office tunnels. We also have a 2208
alteon (application switch) at each site which will be doing load
balancing and failover between the head office and DRP site.

All is fine with the current setup, we setup the 1100's to connect to
vpn.domain.com (not real) for the destination of the tunnel and route
all traffic down that tunnel.

The problem we have now is, we have another ethernet interface in the
1100's we want to use as a backup interface incase the tunnel using
the main line dies. We have cellular routers that go over the HSDPA
or EDGE networks we want to utilize on this secondary ethernet
interface, only if the main line is down.

First we tried using Demand with the trigger as ping, but the router
will not allow us to use a DNS name for the destination address... so
we do not want to just point to one address, incase that one address
dies all of our stores would switch over to the backup interface. If
we could somehow ping our destination for our BOVPN it would be great
(because our vpn.domain.com contains the addresses of both our sites).

Interface groups would also be nice, which we have tried as well... in
the interface group we added the two tunnels to both 1750's and setup
the Demand trigger to use this group. Now, when we disconnect the
main line in testing, it switches over to the backup line and
establishes the tunnel. Problem with this is, now that the interface
group is back up, because the tunnels are back online, the router
tries to switch back over to the main line even though it is still
down. Then it notices the interface group has dropped once more
(because the main line is still down) and switches to backup again -
this loop continues until the main line is actually back up.

I guess I am just looking for any recommendations on how we can
possibly configure this to have complete redundancy at our remote
sites.

So, in review... we have a contivity 1100 at the remote sites with 2
ethernet interfaces, both online. We want the main line (DSL)
connected to a tunnel via a DNS name (vpn.domain.com - which has 2 ips
of each of our 1750s at the head office and DRP site).

Once the tunnel dies, we want to establish another tunnel with the
secondary ethernet interface (cellular) and route all traffic through
it, but only until the main line (DSL) has come back online.... at
that point we would want the tunnel to re-establish using that
interface.

Any recommendations are greatly appreciated.

Thank you.


Pure Networks
Posted by John on May 4, 2007, 1:36 pm
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
Have you looked into 2 Routers doing VRRP to resolve this issue?


> Hi everyone,
>
> We are currently migrating all of our remote store sites to Nortel
> Contivity 1100 routers (called 1100 VPN routers now I believe).
>
> At our head office and DRP site we have 1750's, which the 1100's will
> be connecting to via branch office tunnels. We also have a 2208
> alteon (application switch) at each site which will be doing load
> balancing and failover between the head office and DRP site.
>
> All is fine with the current setup, we setup the 1100's to connect to
> vpn.domain.com (not real) for the destination of the tunnel and route
> all traffic down that tunnel.
>
> The problem we have now is, we have another ethernet interface in the
> 1100's we want to use as a backup interface incase the tunnel using
> the main line dies. We have cellular routers that go over the HSDPA
> or EDGE networks we want to utilize on this secondary ethernet
> interface, only if the main line is down.
>
> First we tried using Demand with the trigger as ping, but the router
> will not allow us to use a DNS name for the destination address... so
> we do not want to just point to one address, incase that one address
> dies all of our stores would switch over to the backup interface. If
> we could somehow ping our destination for our BOVPN it would be great
> (because our vpn.domain.com contains the addresses of both our sites).
>
> Interface groups would also be nice, which we have tried as well... in
> the interface group we added the two tunnels to both 1750's and setup
> the Demand trigger to use this group. Now, when we disconnect the
> main line in testing, it switches over to the backup line and
> establishes the tunnel. Problem with this is, now that the interface
> group is back up, because the tunnels are back online, the router
> tries to switch back over to the main line even though it is still
> down. Then it notices the interface group has dropped once more
> (because the main line is still down) and switches to backup again -
> this loop continues until the main line is actually back up.
>
> I guess I am just looking for any recommendations on how we can
> possibly configure this to have complete redundancy at our remote
> sites.
>
> So, in review... we have a contivity 1100 at the remote sites with 2
> ethernet interfaces, both online. We want the main line (DSL)
> connected to a tunnel via a DNS name (vpn.domain.com - which has 2 ips
> of each of our 1750s at the head office and DRP site).
>
> Once the tunnel dies, we want to establish another tunnel with the
> secondary ethernet interface (cellular) and route all traffic through
> it, but only until the main line (DSL) has come back online.... at
> that point we would want the tunnel to re-establish using that
> interface.
>
> Any recommendations are greatly appreciated.
>
> Thank you.
>



Posted by on May 7, 2007, 2:27 pm
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
> Have you looked into 2 Routers doing VRRP to resolve this issue?
>
>
>
> > Hi everyone,
>
> > We are currently migrating all of our remote store sites to Nortel
> > Contivity 1100 routers (called 1100 VPN routers now I believe).
>
> > At our head office and DRP site we have 1750's, which the 1100's will
> > be connecting to via branch office tunnels. We also have a 2208
> > alteon (application switch) at each site which will be doing load
> > balancing and failover between the head office and DRP site.
>
> > All is fine with the current setup, we setup the 1100's to connect to
> > vpn.domain.com (not real) for the destination of the tunnel and route
> > all traffic down that tunnel.
>
> > The problem we have now is, we have another ethernet interface in the
> > 1100's we want to use as a backup interface incase the tunnel using
> > the main line dies. We have cellular routers that go over the HSDPA
> > or EDGE networks we want to utilize on this secondary ethernet
> > interface, only if the main line is down.
>
> > First we tried using Demand with the trigger as ping, but the router
> > will not allow us to use a DNS name for the destination address... so
> > we do not want to just point to one address, incase that one address
> > dies all of our stores would switch over to the backup interface. If
> > we could somehow ping our destination for our BOVPN it would be great
> > (because our vpn.domain.com contains the addresses of both our sites).
>
> > Interface groups would also be nice, which we have tried as well... in
> > the interface group we added the two tunnels to both 1750's and setup
> > the Demand trigger to use this group. Now, when we disconnect the
> > main line in testing, it switches over to the backup line and
> > establishes the tunnel. Problem with this is, now that the interface
> > group is back up, because the tunnels are back online, the router
> > tries to switch back over to the main line even though it is still
> > down. Then it notices the interface group has dropped once more
> > (because the main line is still down) and switches to backup again -
> > this loop continues until the main line is actually back up.
>
> > I guess I am just looking for any recommendations on how we can
> > possibly configure this to have complete redundancy at our remote
> > sites.
>
> > So, in review... we have a contivity 1100 at the remote sites with 2
> > ethernet interfaces, both online. We want the main line (DSL)
> > connected to a tunnel via a DNS name (vpn.domain.com - which has 2 ips
> > of each of our 1750s at the head office and DRP site).
>
> > Once the tunnel dies, we want to establish another tunnel with the
> > secondary ethernet interface (cellular) and route all traffic through
> > it, but only until the main line (DSL) has come back online.... at
> > that point we would want the tunnel to re-establish using that
> > interface.
>
> > Any recommendations are greatly appreciated.
>
> > Thank you.

In what sense?

I thought a bit about using an HSRP address as the destination for
each remote site to ping (as a trigger for the backup interface), but
this will not work as our head office and DRP are using different ISPs
and are on completely different subnets.

Or did you mean using HSRP at each remote site? If so, we would need
2 routers at each site and would nearly double the expense of this
project. (We have over 300 remote sites..)

Let me know if your idea was different than I have taken it, or if
anyone else has ideas, I would love to hear them!

Thanks again


Posted by nortel user on May 8, 2007, 4:20 am
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
We have a similar set up (I Think)

We have a 1750 at site 1 and a 1750 at our DR site (different
location)
We have a 1100 at each branch. The 1100 has 2 x internet connections
(1 via a dsl card in the 1100 and the 2nd via the ethernet port to a
DSL Modem)

We have set up 2 tunnels to each site (4 tunnels in total)

Tunnel 1 goes to the primary 1750 using the 1100's dsl interface. We
have weighted the route as 10 in the branch office profile
Tunnel 2 also goes to the primary 1750 but using the 1100's ethernet
interface. We have weighted the route as 100 in the branch office
profile
We have repeated the above the the DR site.

When a route becomes unavailable the 1100 automatically re-routes for
us and when the primary routes come back the 1100 automatically re-
routes back via that route.

Could this be a possible solution for your issue?


Posted by on May 10, 2007, 11:13 am
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
> We have a similar set up (I Think)
>
> We have a 1750 at site 1 and a 1750 at our DR site (different
> location)
> We have a 1100 at each branch. The 1100 has 2 x internet connections
> (1 via a dsl card in the 1100 and the 2nd via the ethernet port to a
> DSL Modem)
>
> We have set up 2 tunnels to each site (4 tunnels in total)
>
> Tunnel 1 goes to the primary 1750 using the 1100's dsl interface. We
> have weighted the route as 10 in the branch office profile
> Tunnel 2 also goes to the primary 1750 but using the 1100's ethernet
> interface. We have weighted the route as 100 in the branch office
> profile
> We have repeated the above the the DR site.
>
> When a route becomes unavailable the 1100 automatically re-routes for
> us and when the primary routes come back the 1100 automatically re-
> routes back via that route.
>
> Could this be a possible solution for your issue?

This sounds like it would suit what we are trying to do exactly. I
have tried the two tunnel setup (two for each interface - 4 in total)
on our test 1100, which would be the easiest way to go I believe. But
I think the problem it gave me was it wouldn't create 2 tunnels from
the 1100 to our head office on different interfaces, it said something
along the lines of "You cannot have 2 tunnels with the same
endpoint". This could have been because of weighting though now that
I think about it.

I will try this route again and see how it goes. If this scenario
works for you though, then it would be perfect for our situation.

Thank you for your response, I will post an update after doing some
more testing today.


Similar ThreadsPosted
Nortel contivity 1100 May 7, 2008, 10:01 pm
Setting up SSH access on Contivity 1100. June 15, 2005, 4:48 pm
Contivity 600 changing interface and management address ?? HELP?? July 18, 2006, 6:31 pm
Contivity 1100 Frame Relay problem August 29, 2006, 11:17 am
Nortel VPN Router 221 (a.k.a. Contivity) February 17, 2006, 11:33 am
problem with a Contivity (or VPN router) 600 October 25, 2006, 1:03 pm
Contivity VPN Connectivity Issues WIth D-Link Router October 15, 2006, 11:45 am
Re: Nortel Contivity 1010 VPN Router... How to setup VPN for home users? March 15, 2006, 11:05 pm
Re: Nortel Contivity 1010 VPN Router... How to setup VPN for home users? March 18, 2006, 8:01 am
Nortel Contivity 1010 VPN Router... How to setup VPN for home users? March 14, 2006, 4:17 pm

other useful resources:
The Federal Communications Commission (FCC)
Telecommunications Industry Association
Electronic and Software Security Products and Services
International Telecommunication Union

Custom CGI Perl and PHP programming by 1-Script.com

Contact Us | Privacy Policy
The site map in XML format XML site map