Comcast Upload Speeds

Comcast Upload Speeds

NewsGroups | Search | Tools
 comp.dcom.modems.cable  Post an article  get this group's latest topics as an RSS feed add this group's latest topics to your My MSN content add this group's latest topics to your My Yahoo content  add this group's latest topics to your Google content  YahooMyWeb Yahoo!  Google Google  Windows Live Favorites Windows Live  del.icio.us del.icio.us  digg digg  Add to Netscape Netscape
Subject Author Date
Comcast Upload Speeds exray 02-05-2008
Posted by exray on February 8, 2008, 7:49 pm
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
> There was probably a policy change, or your upgrade was a mistake that
> they later caught. You need to check exactly what speeds are available
> to those without video. As it is, you are probably paying $10-15 more
> than somebody with video. It may be practical to pay for the lowest
> basic video you can get, even if you don't use it, and then you can get
> any speed you want.
>

Andy, the real problem is that they sort of deny ever having had such a tier
as 6/1 available in eastern massachusetts. And of course it's very
difficult to find complete information on current available services and
even more difficult to find information on past available services online.
Communication companies don't seem to want to just tell you "send us $XX per
month and we'll sell you $YY". Everything is a bundle. The only two places
I ever saw the service were first, the letter they mailed to customers, and
then second, for three months in action.

Then they made the service just disappear without any notice at all. If it
was a mistake it was a doozie....giving away a tier of service for a while
that they assert does not exist and they don't remember giving away.

It all makes me wonder if perhaps I am just making it up (they are winning).



Posted by f/fgeorge on February 9, 2008, 8:27 am

>> There was probably a policy change, or your upgrade was a mistake that
>> they later caught. You need to check exactly what speeds are available
>> to those without video. As it is, you are probably paying $10-15 more
>> than somebody with video. It may be practical to pay for the lowest
>> basic video you can get, even if you don't use it, and then you can get
>> any speed you want.
>>
>
>Andy, the real problem is that they sort of deny ever having had such a tier
>as 6/1 available in eastern massachusetts. And of course it's very
>difficult to find complete information on current available services and
>even more difficult to find information on past available services online.
>Communication companies don't seem to want to just tell you "send us $XX per
>month and we'll sell you $YY". Everything is a bundle. The only two places
>I ever saw the service were first, the letter they mailed to customers, and
>then second, for three months in action.
>
>Then they made the service just disappear without any notice at all. If it
>was a mistake it was a doozie....giving away a tier of service for a while
>that they assert does not exist and they don't remember giving away.
>
>It all makes me wonder if perhaps I am just making it up (they are winning).
>
I think the problem is you are fighting a losing cause. All businesses
have the right to change their minds when what they are doing does not
make fiscal sense. For some reason Comcast gave you 6/1 for 3 months,
then stopped. You say you got a flyer saying enjoy the free upgrade,
okay no problem, you did enjoy the free upgrade. No way a company,
ESPECIALLY Comcast, would say "free for ever". Companies just don't do
that and Comcast NEVER would. So you have enjoyed your free upgrade
and now they are telling you if you want to keep that "enhanced" level
you must sign up for more stuff. That is their right and it makes
fiscal sense for them. "Bundling" is a way to offer good sellers with
slow sellers, businesses do it all the time. 'Buy one get one free' is
a good example of a "bundled" sale. Moves product off the shelves to
make room for new stuff. Comcast is just selling you faster internet,
none of us like to wait, along with something you don't want or
apprently need, cable tv. They get more money coming in, and you get
what you want. That makes sense to them but apprently not what you
want. It seems your only alternative is to call Verizon and find out
about DSL or FIOS in your area. There is always satellite internet,
MUCH slower for the same money, but no Comcast involved.

Posted by Exray on February 9, 2008, 6:49 pm
f/f, you are, of course, completely correct. Even if they DID promise the
upgrade as a forever, there must have been some way they'd be able to weasel
out of it.

The annoying thing, as I have said, is that they seem to have no corporate
recollection of the 6/1 that they were giving.... and when I call and tell
them that they are only providing upload of 384, they tell me they have
never done anything else and would I like to buy blast...or maybe I
shouldn't be using a Toshiba 2200 Modem that I own and they'll send a guy
out to check out the system....or maybe my computer settings are wrong....or
perhaps it's the phase of the moon.

It would be refreshing if they were able to send me a copy of the mailing
and point out that it was clearly (or even obscurely) as promotional and
perhaps temporary.


>
>>> There was probably a policy change, or your upgrade was a mistake that
>>> they later caught. You need to check exactly what speeds are available
>>> to those without video. As it is, you are probably paying $10-15 more
>>> than somebody with video. It may be practical to pay for the lowest
>>> basic video you can get, even if you don't use it, and then you can get
>>> any speed you want.
>>>
>>
>>Andy, the real problem is that they sort of deny ever having had such a
>>tier
>>as 6/1 available in eastern massachusetts. And of course it's very
>>difficult to find complete information on current available services and
>>even more difficult to find information on past available services online.
>>Communication companies don't seem to want to just tell you "send us $XX
>>per
>>month and we'll sell you $YY". Everything is a bundle. The only two
>>places
>>I ever saw the service were first, the letter they mailed to customers,
>>and
>>then second, for three months in action.
>>
>>Then they made the service just disappear without any notice at all. If
>>it
>>was a mistake it was a doozie....giving away a tier of service for a while
>>that they assert does not exist and they don't remember giving away.
>>
>>It all makes me wonder if perhaps I am just making it up (they are
>>winning).
>>
> I think the problem is you are fighting a losing cause. All businesses
> have the right to change their minds when what they are doing does not
> make fiscal sense. For some reason Comcast gave you 6/1 for 3 months,
> then stopped. You say you got a flyer saying enjoy the free upgrade,
> okay no problem, you did enjoy the free upgrade. No way a company,
> ESPECIALLY Comcast, would say "free for ever". Companies just don't do
> that and Comcast NEVER would. So you have enjoyed your free upgrade
> and now they are telling you if you want to keep that "enhanced" level
> you must sign up for more stuff. That is their right and it makes
> fiscal sense for them. "Bundling" is a way to offer good sellers with
> slow sellers, businesses do it all the time. 'Buy one get one free' is
> a good example of a "bundled" sale. Moves product off the shelves to
> make room for new stuff. Comcast is just selling you faster internet,
> none of us like to wait, along with something you don't want or
> apprently need, cable tv. They get more money coming in, and you get
> what you want. That makes sense to them but apprently not what you
> want. It seems your only alternative is to call Verizon and find out
> about DSL or FIOS in your area. There is always satellite internet,
> MUCH slower for the same money, but no Comcast involved.



Posted by f/fgeorge on February 10, 2008, 9:13 pm

>f/f, you are, of course, completely correct. Even if they DID promise the
>upgrade as a forever, there must have been some way they'd be able to weasel
>out of it.
>
>The annoying thing, as I have said, is that they seem to have no corporate
>recollection of the 6/1 that they were giving.... and when I call and tell
>them that they are only providing upload of 384, they tell me they have
>never done anything else and would I like to buy blast...or maybe I
>shouldn't be using a Toshiba 2200 Modem that I own and they'll send a guy
>out to check out the system....or maybe my computer settings are wrong....or
>perhaps it's the phase of the moon.
>
>It would be refreshing if they were able to send me a copy of the mailing
>and point out that it was clearly (or even obscurely) as promotional and
>perhaps temporary.
>
If your Toshiba is not docsis 2 compatable, it does not say on the
Toshiba website, other than 'supports all doscis speeds', than you
could need a new modem. Docsis 2 is the newest, or was last time I
checked and the one I first bought from Comcast did not comply and was
always dropping signals etc. Renting from Comcast now lets me call
them when they upgrade their system. More money now but less expensive
in the very long run.

Posted by $Bill on February 9, 2008, 7:10 pm
f/fgeorge wrote:
>
> I think the problem is you are fighting a losing cause. All businesses
> have the right to change their minds when what they are doing does not
> make fiscal sense. For some reason Comcast gave you 6/1 for 3 months,
> then stopped. You say you got a flyer saying enjoy the free upgrade,
> okay no problem, you did enjoy the free upgrade. No way a company,
> ESPECIALLY Comcast, would say "free for ever". Companies just don't do
> that and Comcast NEVER would. So you have enjoyed your free upgrade
> and now they are telling you if you want to keep that "enhanced" level
> you must sign up for more stuff. That is their right and it makes
> fiscal sense for them. "Bundling" is a way to offer good sellers with
> slow sellers, businesses do it all the time. 'Buy one get one free' is
> a good example of a "bundled" sale. Moves product off the shelves to
> make room for new stuff. Comcast is just selling you faster internet,
> none of us like to wait, along with something you don't want or
> apprently need, cable tv. They get more money coming in, and you get
> what you want. That makes sense to them but apprently not what you
> want. It seems your only alternative is to call Verizon and find out
> about DSL or FIOS in your area. There is always satellite internet,
> MUCH slower for the same money, but no Comcast involved.

Geez - take the corporate stance why don't you. 6/.5 is the normal on
our cable - don't see why Comcast couldn't manage the same. Oh, and
it's not 'free' - I pay $40-45/mo for mine (forget the exact amount).
That's a lot of money for a lot of people to pay every month for
something as basic as internet access. The problem with internet access
is we still don't have enough competition to get a reasonable pricing
structure - it's still pretty much a monopoly in many areas.

Similar ThreadsPosted
Please help troubleshoot my slow upload speeds! March 23, 2006, 11:14 am
New Comcast Speeds July 29, 2005, 7:36 pm
Strange upload slowdown issues - help! March 1, 2005, 8:18 am
Upload speed problems with large files August 22, 2005, 3:03 pm
How long can you upload before Optimum Online caps? January 20, 2007, 4:00 pm
Does WEP Slow Down Speeds This Much? September 5, 2005, 9:46 am
Lousy Transfer Speeds July 17, 2006, 8:08 am
Re: IMPORTANT!! ALL COMCAST Subscribers!! PLZ READ! COMCAST COMCAST November 1, 2006, 11:36 am
Re: IMPORTANT!! ALL COMCAST Subscribers!! PLZ READ! COMCAST COMCAST November 6, 2006, 2:04 pm
Comcast November 15, 2005, 5:33 pm

other useful resources:
The Federal Communications Commission (FCC)
Telecommunications Industry Association
Electronic and Software Security Products and Services
International Telecommunication Union

Custom CGI Perl and PHP programming by 1-Script.com

Contact Us | Privacy Policy
The site map in XML format XML site map